Anonymous
ID: 96ljjYnA
6/30/2025, 2:20:37 PM No.509120472
I really don't understand women at all. They are pretty much completely retarded, believe everything from the ruling class without question, not loyal to their men, but also prone to extreme religiousity, and will ironically defend their views till death. (So that pretty much means most libtard feminists cannot be rehabilatated but will die horribly in camps).
Second like hoemath pretty much explains, women like being dominated and degraded. They tell you they want to be 'respected' but that is a complete lie, most 'feminist' women are completely into BDSM-subculture and just want you to pretty much tie them up and rape them while abusing them. (literally). The more feminist they are the more it is. (Don't believe me? Look up Rachel Greyhound or Maggie Mayhem, Jade Marx or Madison Young. All so called active feminists but in 24/7 slave relationships. That means them being caged, tied up, spit on, beaten with whips etc.)
Look it up. Only in SM/BDSM do you have a much bigger female to male ratio.
I really don't understand the genetic aspect of this. I know that people say that women are evolved to adapt to tribal capture and slavery, but again this was only a strong thing in the neolithic to late bronze age. When cities came to exist wars were usually pretty local and limited to modern standards. Most rulers (from Hammurabi to Rome) had a big interest to keep taxpayers and strong capable working people alive. (Women are/were not producers in any real way).
Only in the Islamic age this type of barbarism got a big return as you can read in the literature by Raymond Ibrahim.
Two questions for pol here. Wtf would women 'evolve' this kind of crazy and treacherous behaviour in only a extremely short period of time (+- 5000 years?).
Second is why would women fetishize this shit? Don't they know that in those kind of 'situations' every man, pregnant women and woman above childbearing age (+- 30) were horribly executed? I mean Nanjing Massacre kind of shit.
Second like hoemath pretty much explains, women like being dominated and degraded. They tell you they want to be 'respected' but that is a complete lie, most 'feminist' women are completely into BDSM-subculture and just want you to pretty much tie them up and rape them while abusing them. (literally). The more feminist they are the more it is. (Don't believe me? Look up Rachel Greyhound or Maggie Mayhem, Jade Marx or Madison Young. All so called active feminists but in 24/7 slave relationships. That means them being caged, tied up, spit on, beaten with whips etc.)
Look it up. Only in SM/BDSM do you have a much bigger female to male ratio.
I really don't understand the genetic aspect of this. I know that people say that women are evolved to adapt to tribal capture and slavery, but again this was only a strong thing in the neolithic to late bronze age. When cities came to exist wars were usually pretty local and limited to modern standards. Most rulers (from Hammurabi to Rome) had a big interest to keep taxpayers and strong capable working people alive. (Women are/were not producers in any real way).
Only in the Islamic age this type of barbarism got a big return as you can read in the literature by Raymond Ibrahim.
Two questions for pol here. Wtf would women 'evolve' this kind of crazy and treacherous behaviour in only a extremely short period of time (+- 5000 years?).
Second is why would women fetishize this shit? Don't they know that in those kind of 'situations' every man, pregnant women and woman above childbearing age (+- 30) were horribly executed? I mean Nanjing Massacre kind of shit.
Replies: