Thread 509174290 - /pol/ [Archived: 773 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: PMNe7a0lUnited States
7/1/2025, 2:32:55 AM No.509174290
IMG_6266
IMG_6266
md5: 46472f27f99acbec1d20ebcdb0f81c17🔍
>buys a hydrogen fuel powered car
What the fuck were you thinking?
https://ktla.com/news/california/from-the-next-prius-to-paperweight-hydrogen-cars-exasperate-owners-prompt-lawsuit-against-toyota/amp/
Replies: >>509174750 >>509175577
Anonymous ID: frgDcm4OUnited States
7/1/2025, 2:39:54 AM No.509174750
>>509174290 (OP)
They're Californians, what did you expect?
Anonymous ID: fS/mtYUjUnited States
7/1/2025, 2:42:58 AM No.509174949
What is the reason for the hydrogen investment? NO SCHIZO ANSWERS, please just give me the tip of the iceberg with sources.
Replies: >>509175615 >>509176956
Anonymous ID: fS/mtYUjUnited States
7/1/2025, 2:46:41 AM No.509175199
>>Here is $15,000 of free fuel. It’ll last you three years

Jesus, I spend less than $1000 a year on gas.
Anonymous ID: knAQbKqiUnited States
7/1/2025, 2:51:31 AM No.509175577
>>509174290 (OP)
>I passed 0 hydrogen fuel stations on my way to pick up my Prius
>there are 0 hydrogen fuel stations on my way to work, to get groceries, or my regional vacation spot

It’s Toyotas fault and I need to be compensated
Anonymous ID: NJifen9vGermany
7/1/2025, 2:52:09 AM No.509175615
>>509174949
Hydrogen represents a viable long-term energy storage solution for electricity generated from renewable sources. By contrast, batteries are less suited for extended storage due to energy loss during charging and gradual performance degradation over time. As such, investment in hydrogen infrastructure should be considered an essential element of any comprehensive renewable energy strategy.
source: chat gpt
Replies: >>509177444
Anonymous ID: QcV7w0QSCroatia
7/1/2025, 3:12:54 AM No.509176956
>>509174949
You can buy a small station that usess electricity and water to create hydrogen. Its faster and easier to charge the car.
I dont get how you can sue a company for not many chargers. By that logic you can sue the EVs too.
Anonymous ID: xsduH3BJ
7/1/2025, 3:20:14 AM No.509177444
>>509175615
No one gives a shit about your AI slop. You have outsourced the few braincells you had to a jewish program.

A hydrogen car crashing will blow out an apartment complex. We are not close to taming that technology yet.
Nuclear on the other hand is more within grasp.
Replies: >>509178060 >>509178284
Anonymous ID: NJifen9vGermany
7/1/2025, 3:28:54 AM No.509178060
>>509177444
this is a non issue because people also have big propane gas tanks in front of their houses, these containers are designed to withstand fire with an outer shell will emit an diffusing agent, and you can always use the hydrogen to produce ammonia as an e-fuel or you can use other compound chemicals to bind the hydrogen. it's more important for storage tho.
Anonymous ID: i+4dbdFTCanada
7/1/2025, 3:32:16 AM No.509178284
>>509177444
The non-AI answer is that hydrogen powered vehicles seemed like a viable option compared to gas or electric because hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, meaning there's so much of it its basically like free energy. The only problem is that creating infrastructure to refuel them is absurdly expensive, the cost to capture and compress it or whatever to make it a fuel source uses a lot of energy and is expensive, and compressed hydrogen is highly explosive. You'd be riding on a bomb, basically. The car exhaust is just water vapour though, so I guess there's that.