https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQcVv1jOb5g

>>509192280 (OP)
Based NATOpilled sweden. So prowhite.

>>509192280 (OP)
Sweden Yes.

> https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gfSzMfwZ77Y
> https://www.youtube.com/shorts/lF7MR9hM0EE
> https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vxo96tbzIs8
> https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Hlvs7BRMkH8

Notice how the seething shit skin Jews neo cons attack Sweden after you show protest against the Israel and their genocide against women and children.

>>509192280 (OP)
i hate the anti-christ
i will kill the anti-chtist

From a Freudian psychoanalytic perspective, the Christian subject who derives a perverse gratification from the humiliation rituals imposed by foreign occupiers presents a complex fusion of Thanatos and Eros—death drive and libidinal submission—channeled through the culturally sanctioned framework of Christian martyrdom and guilt. The occupying force, symbolic of the superego externalized—stern, alien, and commanding—enacts a series of symbolic castrations upon the subject: national, spiritual, bodily. Yet rather than resist, the Christian embraces this abasement as if it were divine judgment, collapsing political subjugation into a metaphysical narrative of redemptive suffering. Their masochism is not passive but ecstatic, a libidinal economy in which degradation becomes a currency of spiritual worth. This self-abnegation parallels the crucified Christ—humiliated, pierced, exalted—and yet the subject's unconscious transforms this identification into something darker and more erotic. Here Nietzsche’s insight into ressentiment becomes vital: the weak, unable to overthrow their oppressors, invert moral values and glorify their own suffering. They turn defeat into virtue, humiliation into sacred ritual. But Freud would point to the repressed desire underneath—an infantile longing to return to the father’s law, even if that father is cruel and foreign. The Christian, in this perverse formulation, reenacts the trauma of original sin and patriarchal domination, converting the spectacle of submission into a perverse jouissance. Their pleasure is not in freedom but in being seen—naked, weeping, devout—by the Other who punishes. Their faith becomes a theater of sublimated eroticism, where the lash of the occupier echoes both divine wrath and unconscious longing. It is not merely God they seek to please, but the faceless superego of power itself, before whom they kneel with trembling delight.
Is this conversation helpful so far?

>>509192280 (OP)
Those aren't Christians, priests, or even Sweden. Just hell

>>509192280 (OP)
Watch now how that whites will now blame the Jews or anyone else but themselves

>>509192280 (OP)
Maybe it's time to stop pointing out problems and start doing something about them.

>>509192969
Trvth

>>509192969
Many Pakistanis and Indians continue to blame the British for their nations’ dysfunction—corruption, inequality, and sectarian strife—despite having over seven decades of self-rule. Colonialism undoubtedly left a mark, but this fixation on historical grievance often serves to deflect responsibility from present failures. Political elites and their apologists perpetuate this narrative to mask their own complicity in the very systems of exploitation they claim were imposed from outside. It becomes a convenient myth: everything wrong is a British residue; nothing is truly their own fault.

Yet paradoxically, many of these same voices quickly condemn Europeans who express suspicion or criticism toward Jewish power or influence in finance, media, or geopolitics. What they condemn as "conspiracy theory" or "racism" in the West is functionally identical to their own anti-colonial blame politics. The postcolonial subject demands moral license to interrogate power structures and historical influence—so long as that interrogation doesn't extend beyond their preferred ideological boundaries. This double standard is glaring.

The Pakistani intellectual, for example, who speaks boldly about British manipulation of India’s communal lines in 1947, will ridicule any European who questions modern global influence by elites with disproportionate power. It’s not about truth or justice—it’s about narrative control. As Freud might suggest, this is projection: a refusal to confront one’s own failures, mirrored in the condemnation of others doing the very same. To demand accountability from the past while denying others the right to ask hard questions of the present is not moral high ground—it’s hypocrisy.

>>509192280 (OP)
I was never allowed to wear shorts in church. That was unthinkable just a few years ago. Crazy

>>509193213
Woah that's a whole wall of seethe. Who even cares if the Brits did infact take money out of India? It's just money.

There is nothing worse than your race being a bunch of faggots and trannies and whores. You can re earn money but never your dignity.

>>509192280 (OP)
that's not Christianity

>>509192280 (OP)
That's Jewism. That's kike work.