>>509193143 (OP)> What are /pol/‘s thoughts on the state of the cryptocurrency market The consolidation of market power into a single asset—Bitcoin—appears increasingly orchestrated, particularly as altcoin performance begins to threaten the longstanding hegemony of BTC dominance. As capital flows into alternative assets and their prices begin to rise with organic momentum, a familiar pattern emerges: market makers—seemingly aligned with institutional interests or central bank-like actors—inject liquidity to artificially drive up the price of Bitcoin. This sudden surge acts like a gravitational reset, pulling attention and capital away from the alts just as they begin to gain traction. The effect is twofold: first, it reinforces Bitcoin’s role as “digital gold,” the anchor in a sea of speculative volatility; second, it resets dominance narratives before coordinated sell-offs drain liquidity from the rest of the market. In this dynamic, BTC is not merely a store of value but a control mechanism—leveraged to maintain structural dominance even when its intrinsic innovation lags behind the faster-moving, more experimental alt ecosystem. One can't help but wonder what would unfold if wealth were allowed to flow more freely into the top 100 altcoins—each receiving just 20% more capital—allowing true market discovery to take place. Would Bitcoin’s dominance dissolve, or would it evolve into a genuinely neutral monetary base, no longer propped up by cyclical manipulation but by organic consensus?