>>509206618You're just seething because she has correctly identified that the actions of your government are morally wrong
>>509207706>baselessActually there's a lot of evidence:
>There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/
>who caresKilling civilians is wrong. How would you like it if bombs were being dropped on the UK? We would want people around the world to try and stop this bombing wouldn't we?
>If she cared about the environment she would reject the globalism she represents, reject her stupid vegan diet in favour of an ethically superior carnivore dietShe set off for Gaza on a sailing boat, powered by the wind. That doesn't damage the environment. She has been on sailing boats before instead of using polluting planes.
As for veganism, I'm pretty sure veganism is better for the environment than eating meat is. We've bred loads of livestock for meat, and those animals emit greenhouse gases, causing climate change:
>Methane from cattle burps and manure is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions; globally, cows and other farm animals are responsible for about 14% of human-induced climate emissions.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/apr/02/british-cows-could-be-given-methane-blockers-to-cut-carbon-emissions