>>509297698Good and bad are leftist notions, youโre just an idiot if you believe in economic planning, and the cost of believing in them is your freedom too. Youโre supposed to believe in right and wrong, not good and bad. Right and wrong is static and objective, logical, blind, and good and bad is subjective interpersonal nonsense and big shock it has always turned out to actually be bad in practice.
This is called german idealism or the german concept of freedom and it actually inspired Marx. Make no mistake, the ultimate purpose of communism, according to Marx, was freedom. Equality is just a hallmark, an essential part of the mix, it was really all about Marx wanting autonomy to work as he pleased, said he wanted to mill about between several different jobs a day, though in all likelihood I doubt he would have worked at all.
Anyway, the german concept of freedom is autonomy, autonomy is not following others rules, to do achieve this you must commit to believing in only rules that you would have others follow too. The opposite is called heteronomy, these are beliefs that have been imposed on you by others. My soft spot for right wingers is only that you have taken the second set of heteronomous beliefs offered and you are one step closer to being a free thinker than a left winger, but only one step. Whether this matters to you or not it is insightful, there is either categorical morality, or there is nothing that can objectively be called morality. You are a moral relativist, I know people donโt think about things as deep as I do, but you basically function on good words and bad words right? Well there you have it, youโre a bad word, youโre a moral relativist.