>>509311065 (OP)Women are largely blind to disability and aren't capable of empathizing with a man if it's a mental health issue, they forget the moment you do something halfway normal. Clearly her retardation and his repeated appeals lead to a crisis point, where she eventually realized he is in fact disabled and not able to maintain employment, regardless of what her shitty opinion is on the situation. He probably tried to explain to her, over and over and over, but she refused to listen (probably convinced by other shitty toxic females in her life) and now she has to pay big time for it. What more was he supposed to do?
Basically what happened was the female in OP's picrel was probably a dumpy fefail herself and thought she'd have good luck securing autisimo boy here and then slowly got poisoned by her friends over time about how he should be doing more, etc (kek actually they are jealous) and is now buttmad he wasn't what she was expecting him to be, doesn't understand the outcome of her decisions and now thinks she now deserves better
Judge was correct in this situation to ding her given the circumstance. She knows he has difficulty with employment.
>>509312783Yeah no the court should order her to pay extra because she knows full well he is disabled yet was forcing him into employment situations he's clearly not able to maintain. Imagine if a man did this, women would be frothing at the mouth.
>>509312937>yeah but if the genders were reversed you'd be screaming in rageYup, 100% if the ADHD here was a woman and a man was ignoring her disability and expecting her to go work mostly because he's a retard and won't let her get all autistic about spreadsheets and finances (seriously, what the fuck is his problem is he retarded or a trust issue) he'd be liable to be sued to the fucking moon and back.
If it's a man though, then suddenly he's faking it or lazy or whatever