>>509340903Wow, congrats. Sex is not the problem. Literally all these women want is sex.
>>509340485 (OP)No, women are still willing to date a variety of men. The key difference is, for what percentage of men are women willing to change their priorities even the slightest? That number is smaller than 10%, and it's shrinking.
In a few years, we will have women graduating college at a 2:1 ratio to men. We already have single women with a higher rate of home ownership than men. This is the pipeline that they prefer to stay on because they don't believe they owe anything to society or to men.
Meanwhile, men are raised from birth to believe that we owe something to women, and if we don't feel this way, then we "aren't men".
Women continue to look at this pool of men willing to do more for women than women are willing to do for men, and they look at it with disgust. They look down on men like a lower species. That's why they refuse to compromise unless their feelings become so overwhelmed with the "deal" that they can get out of a man, much in the same way you see an incredible $1000 item at Costco that is now $300. They are willing to move their budget around for that deal, but they're also still willing to pull out whenever it suits them, because to them it was always about the deal, and it was never really about sex (they are always able to get sex), so therefore it can't be about "attraction" in the same way that men use this term (as a measurement of desire to have sex).