Major US university structural engineering study directly contradicts NIST explanation of collapse of WTC7 on 9/11/2001
>The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

>>509368284 (OP)

> the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building
AKA Demolition

>>509368473
Aka layman's interpretation of something he doesn't understand

>>509368284 (OP)
muslims did it because they secretly wanted us to invade their countries and fuck them up to help the jews. When you really think about it, only the muslims benefitted from 9/11

I clicked the link and my malware detector went fucking nuts
Be smart, anons

>>509368463
>>509368641
>>509368784
>>509369130
ITT akshuall jidf kikes on damage control

>>509368284 (OP)
What is this 2002? The fuck!?

>>509371161
What’s your motive? Because you act like a sewer rat

>>509368784
>muslims did it
no, it was demolition man

>>509368641
No he's correct. They're saying someone blew all the columns at once as they do in a demolition.
Source: not a layman