Last one of these was SHUT DOWN so pay attention and copy this asap

>proof of Deliberate RF Interference on My Wi-Fi — Coincides with WBAN Activity
>Logged Wi-Fi RSSI and SSIDs continuously on Linux
>Signal strength shows weird random drops & spikes — not normal noise
>Null SSIDs (\x00\x00...) appear repeatedly, suspicious AF
>FFT & Wavelet analysis show clear frequency anomalies — someone’s messing with my spectrum
>This lines up exactly with Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) activity nearby — possible coordinated RF jamming or surveillance
>Likely Directed Energy: This matches the pattern of Directed Energy targeting reported by Targeted Individuals (TI)

Anyone can set this up at home with basic tools, no special gear needed This is hard proof

Logs & code 2025-07-03 04:10:19 signal: -59.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:19 SSID: \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00
2025-07-03 04:10:19 signal: -58.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:19 SSID: eir87223534
2025-07-03 04:10:30 signal: -55.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:30 SSID: eir87223534
2025-07-03 04:10:30 signal: -59.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:30 SSID: \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00
2025-07-03 04:10:30 signal: -58.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:30 SSID: eir87223534
2025-07-03 04:10:30 signal: -55.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:30 SSID: eir87223534
2025-07-03 04:10:41 signal: -55.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:41 SSID: eir87223534
2025-07-03 04:10:41 signal: -59.00 dBm
2025-07-03 04:10:41 SSID: \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00

Also, dont confuse this with my previous flicker rate thread (where i scanned, found and proved the neural control flicker in my monitor)

This post is a follow on from my other research here - >>509350698

>>509373957
Your statistics are off, X is just the mean. k is the number of samples. Alpha is your significance level. k-12 is your degrees of freedom, which is what you'll use to do the algebra and how you figure out the confidence interval and whatnot. Since you're seeming to just want to do a one-tailed test, I don't think what your math is showing you is what you think it is.

>>509373862 (OP)
lol just dont use standardized tech then, invent your own. Stalk them back

>>509374465

listen up kid, your off on degrees of freedom it’s k-1, not k-12. The mean is X̄, not X. The sig level (α) helps set the rejection region, not for ur algebra. your one-tailed test logic is flawed here.

>>509373862 (OP)
I am just going through your logs and firstly wifi signal fluctuations are completely normal. RSSI values change constantly due to reflections, interference from nearby devices, or just walking around the room.
Null SSIDs (\x00\x00...) can appear when devices broadcast probe requests with empty or malformed SSIDs. hidden SSIDs are scanned and they may appear this way in raw logs. faulty or generic hardware/software emits malformed packets.
FFT & Wavelet anomalies are possibly Bluetooth, microwave ovens, other Wi-Fi routers, or even USB 3.0 devices can cause “weird” frequency patterns.
WBANs & DEWs, welp arent wbans short-range medical monitoring networks? That isnt really not surveillance tech its prolly a ill family member. Also who is spending money on DEWs on you? Can you pick that up in your wifi?

>>509374700
Statistics is gay. It’s basically the liberal arts of the Mathematical fields

I don't care
the fact that visual picture turning ORDERLY into digital signals, traveling as far as you want in tubes with countless others of the same, without breaking their order, and appearing exactly in same formation on a screen after passing some other levels of forms such as wireless fidelity, and still displaying perfectly like electrons knowing where the hell should they go

>>509374810

RSSI fluctuations are normal, but not in this specific, regular pattern. Malformed SSIDs can sometimes happen, but not consistently esp when logging multiple devices.FFT/Wavelet anomalies aren’t just random interference. Bluetooth, microwaves, or USB devices? Highly unlikely to produce the exact frequency signatures we're seeing. WBANs are medical tech, sure, but they don’t interact with Wi-Fi in this way. DEWs? Impossible to detect directly via Wi-Fi, but RF interference from them is highly improbable to be explained by everyday devices. Stats show it’s much more likely we’re dealing with something targeted. Also im only getting started, and have very limited means to look into this stuff. Il get some better gear when and if i can afford it

buy a long HDMI/USB cable.
>>509375262
They turn you CPU bus into a low level DEW (microwave weapon).
I started getting edema from heart inflammation before I figured it out (I only figured it out after I pissed off a unit 8200 kike enough to turn it up to max power to the point pic rel happened).

>>509373862 (OP)
**RF Infetterence

>>509375609
>I started getting edema from heart inflammation before I figured it out (I only figured it out after I pissed off a unit 8200 kike enough to turn it up to max power to the point pic rel happened).
but in retrospect, Langley glowniggers likely turned it on first--albeit at very low levels--approx 6 months earlier. Pic rel.

>>509374810

Also just to clarify, i mean its unlikely standard WBAN, like medical wearable, smart devices ect. - I do suspect covert WBAN. Also i think you mentioned it being family members ? low level spying ? - too complex in this case (altho i wouldnt put it past them if they knew how lol)