very coincidental

Yeah thats the point, the name is poking fun at build back better.

>>509377877

>>509377877
>*fails to pass*
a literal vegetable was able to get more done than trump lol

>>509377841 (OP)
Hearing reports on Twitter that Joe Rogan died. Anyone confirm?

>>509377877
>i-its 4d chess!
>its not more jewish luciferian trash I swear bro!
>c-come on man indians are bro tier - theyre literally our bros!
>maga!

>>509377877
Show me where they said that.

>>509377841 (OP)
Gay conspiracy

>>509377877
poking fun? maybe at us for voting this zog faggot into office.

>>509377841 (OP)
>you're getting BBB, regardless of whom you vote for

>>509377841 (OP)
>6uild 6ack 6etter
>6ig 6eutiful 6ill
fell for it again

>>509377841 (OP)
The powers that be have a new system that has been in the development for decades now, ready to be rolled out in the coming years. It will operate in parallel starting sometime this year and by the next decade it will be fully operational as the Agenda 2030 goals are slowly being implemented.
There will be no collapse, no violence, no uprising, no world war, no revolution, no killing of jews or politicians or other such fantasies. Instead there will be law & order, compliance and total surveillance until the very end. AI will be at the center of it all.

The Great Reset is inevitable.

>>509377841 (OP)
Big Beautiful Benis
Going down the throat of every leftoid

>>509381821
lmao first time noticing that

>>509377987
Link?

>>509378146
>Do you have a source on that?
Source?
>A source. I need a source.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>Do you have a degree in that field?
>A college degree? In that field?
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated.
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
>Nope, still haven't.
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.