Are they retarded? How do they even remember to breathe? What are the political implications of 42 iq on the world?

>>509445264 (OP)
I’m skeptical of those numbers

>>509445264 (OP)
I pooped

>>509445264 (OP)
Fake

>>509445546
yeah real IQs under 80 are just retarded people, nepalese are probably about 85-90 like most dumb browns

>>509445264 (OP)
Nah, there's no way, anything less than 60 is clinical mental retardation. You cannot care for yourself type retardation. Putting a fork in the toaster type of retarded. Drinking drain cleaner type of retarded.

>>509445264 (OP)
There's no way they have half the IQ of negroes

>>509445751
That's an Occident-centric perspective though, they clearly make it work

>>509445264 (OP)

screencap, bullshit claim, "make board less interesting"

>>509445264 (OP)
Just another street shittin, clinically retard jeet subspecies, are you surprised?

>>509445751
This is part of the fundamental error of assuming that we’re all the same species.
A white with an IQ of 70 is going to be a drooling retard who probably can’t tie his own shoes. It’s a defect.
A chimp with an IQ of 70 would be quite intelligent - for a chimp. He’s probably going to be leading his troop.
Similarly, a Khoisan hunter with an IQ of 70 is perfectly normal and capable of doing all of the things he needs to do, but he’s missing a lot of higher reasoning skills found in other races. In him it isn’t a defect, it’s the norm.

IQs don't measure school learnin, they measure problem solvin.
This is dumb and gay. OP should definitely kill himself.

>>509445264 (OP)
If you get bored midway or decide to half ass it you're gonna get a simian IQ, just saying

>>509446408

That's why I can argue with other whites online who manage a business or have successful careers or are amazing with cars etc but when I bring up epistemology and things that require high levels of conceptual thinking, they come off as a drooling retard.

Low iq people can be very capable but their abstract reasoning abilities and critical thinking are MIA.

>>509445264 (OP)
Having spent several weeks in Nepal I don't think it can be that low.

People are generally nice and relatively well behaved. They're kind of dirty and spit everywhere, but they're not violent and generally pretty nice. The government is super corrupt and so they don't have power even in the capital city for most nights and rolling blackouts are a super common thing. Also retardedly they've decided on a 15 minute time zone offset from India, so it makes it stupidly hard to immediately remember exactly what time it is in the US or really anywhere.

There's generally a lack of initiative and that's probably why most of the economy is cement blocks, carpets, and then tourism and nicknacks (the lack of consistent power probably doesn't help).

They're not bright, but it's hard for me to see the average being below 80.

>>509446873

I worked with a few Nepalese guys. They didn't come off as stupid or retarded. Seemed pretty normal to me.

>>509445264 (OP)
all the national iq figures are based on richard lynn publications and are complete and utter garbage
they're probably low iq
but not by that much

>>509445264 (OP)
>socio-economic factors
Who was the first person to invent this conjunction of terms and used it publicly -- are they fucking dead? (I hope so)

>>509445556
Thank you for service. I pooped also but it was before I encountered this thread.>>509445624

>>509445546
Where on the rarity iceberg is this flag

>>509445624
>>509445751
>>509445888

>google.com

>>509446873
>Having spent several weeks in Nepal I don't think it can be that low.

Or maybe yours is too. Thought about that ever?

>>509445264 (OP)
IQ is a meme and anyone who takes it seriously is on the same level as women who think astrology is real.

>>509445264 (OP)
42 is astoundingly low, I'd expect something more along the lines of high 60's/low 70's like the jeet average.

>>509448015

I agree it is. It's weird though they can't even think for themselves. Imagine someone else doing the thinking for you.

>>509447933
Literally the only people who believe this are niggerbrains and niggerbrain apologists.
IQ isn't the be-all and end-all of intelligence but dismissing it as a serious measure (especially averaged for large groups) is utterly ridiculous and reeks of you being ashamed at being a midwit.
It's okay to be average, anon.

>>509445904

Yeh! I'm not glued to the screen fuckface.

>>509447721
OH MY GOD YOU FUCKING GENIUS YOU GAVE ME A LINK TO THE SUM TOTAL OF ALL HUMAN KNOWLEGE AND NOW MY BRAIN HAS SWOLLEN SO BIG IT EXPLODED WITH INFINITE WISDOM YOU GOD DAMN FUCKING BRILLIANT ASS GENIUS YOU FUCKING FUCK.

>>509448469

You are welcome
0wie0
:D

>>509446408
This anon is 100% correct. The comparison between a 70 IQ human and 70 IQ chimp is spot on. People misunderstand the whole
>But muh 60 IQ and below is clinical retardation
It is, but different species/races experience IQ differently. The baseline 100 IQ is relative to Europeans, non-Europeans can't exactly be measured accurately. However, Australian Aboriginals (the pure ones and ones with very low amounts of European admixture) legitimately have IQs 60 and below. But if you ever meet one, you will think
>Well they didn't seem THAT retarded
They can generally hold sentences, can follow (very) basic concepts, can do mundane tasks, etc. So I can fully accept that some people can have IQs below 50 and not be your typical drooling retards

>>509447933
>t. Nepalese mutt

They evolved to breathe the lower oxygen at altitude.

Kek I just checked in a thread about this on r/nepal and half of it is complaining that IQ tests are bullshit and the other half is Nepalese calling themselves dumb.

It seems this was a matter of hot debate in the Kathmandu post and all they could counter it with was "nuh-uh, that would mean we're severely retarded, you're racist."

>>509445264 (OP)
Remember - as smart as AI is, it's only as smart as the people feeding it data
If the data comes from retards or scammers, the answer will also be retarded

Only trust logic and empirical evidence
- nepal buildings look cool
- retards cant make cool buildings
- therefore, 42 iq (and being below AFRICA) must not be true

If IQ is a different thing for different races, whats the fucking point of measuring? The measurement should mean the same thing across all races!

That Richard Lynn was a fucking nigger making shit up. Dont trust his data.

>>509449493
Well gorillas have an IQ of about 90.

>>509449217
the number 42 is also a very special number to the wizzies who invented the internet

42 being the answer to life the universe and everything

42 is also the time between the beginning of the world and the moment earth was struck by an asteroid

>>509449493
Go ahead and create a single method to accurately gauge intelligence between cats, dogs, cows, horses, apes, and dolphins.

I guess our only mistake with IQ was trying to apply it to subhumans (you)

>>509449493
There's jeetflag hiding behind that memeflag

>>509450086
Humans are the same. A better analogy would be making a test to measure the IQ of cardinals, bluejays, hummingbirds. You Retard!

A 100 IQ should mean to same for every race! Gawd, this IQ stuff really was useless!

>>509445624
I knew a filipina with a 80 iq. Took a test with her to compare intelligence because she said she was smarter than me. I was only 110 but still she was retarded. But she gave the best blowjobs I ever had. I should have just married her bros, would have made my life a hell of a lot simpler.

>>509446408
IQ is a quotient not an aggregate, it's only genetic insofar as it's a tool used for selection, the original IQ tests were purely psychometric. In the 20th century it was used as a metric to see if someone was capable of factory labor, if they could not meet the baseline criteria for this they would be sterilized. It doesn't do anything else other than test someone's ability to take standardized tests. People can lose 10-30 points on their IQ by retaking tests and increase their scores by studying the tests, what's being selected for isn't genetic, but how seriously you take arbitrary testing. This in turn does influence genetics because quotients correspond to behavioral characteristics, but it doesn't describe genetics it merely highlights behavior. The concept of IQ needs to be redone as industrial models shift toward automation, it's not satisfactory anymore.

>>509450482
You are a disgusting race mixer

Buddhs was a Nepalese

>>509445546
Nice to see that flag out here bruv
But I would be a little skeptical on the administration means. But I think pic rel is what pulls me out of that concept to be like maybe this fire is a little too hot and a little too large.

>>509448467
Your behavior points to the contrary

>>509445546
G U A M
=
U.S. Air Force
I am reporting this I.P. to Force Protection and OSI. We will determine who is posting on this hate board!

>>509450086
It exists, it's called the mirror stage. This is the baseline component of testing if something is sentient or aware. The more complicated the illusion the more intelligent something is. Media in a way is the highest form of intelligence test around, discerning what's real and fake is becoming more difficult by the year.

>>509450540
Worse I married a white woman who gained weight and smokes all day. But we do have beautiful kids. Just sucks my wife decided to slam into the wall at age 24. I would definitely pick the filipina over my wife now though I can assure you that

>>509450482
>tfw no tard wife

education =/= IQ

>>509445264 (OP)
>socio-economic factors

>>509445264 (OP)
Threadly reminder that IQ tests are calibrated to a specific population (with 100 being the mean average IQ for the population). There is no such thing as a global IQ test that allows you to compare individuals from different countries.

>>509451570
>But we do have beautiful kids
mission accomplished then. Go get that filipina side pussy king, you earned it.

>>509452005
I would but I think I'd feel guilty. Even though my wife is a fat bitch if she ever found out I would be in a bad situation. Just hoping she cheats first I guess

>>509445721
retarded like npc retarded not clinical one.
Iq it's on a distribution curve so it's like take 15 random people and 2 of them are in the 70-85 range, but you need 50 people and then pick the most retarded to get a 55-70 retard.
100 being the average mean that 100 it's the fucking average npc, think almost all the pol people are 115+ which sound high in country stats but it's just being the brightest in a 7 people room, or in the top 4 in a 30 people class. think for most of pol it's a daily occurence.

>>509452303
why is she fat?

>>509453474
She eats 10 fruit by the foots a day and lives a sedentary lifestyle. She also eats pizza when I'm at work

>>509446873
>retardedly they've decided on a 15 minute time zone offset from India
That's hilariously retarded. But I could see elbows up Canadians in the east doing the same if Trump were to re-name a new permanent daylight savings Eastern time zone as the "Trump Time Zone".

>>509445264 (OP)
This is how you know these numbers are pulled out of their asses

>>509445264 (OP)
One thing you need to understand about IQ is its a synthetic benchmark that only tests one specific aspect of intelligence. Consider that a gorilla would score zero on a human IQ test, but can still look after itself. Whilst a white person with an IQ of zero would be unfit for life. The people of Nepal are likely incapable of various higher reasoning functions, but that does not meant they are incapable of basic life skills.

>>509454983
>one specific aspect of intelligence.
No, it tests a range of measures of intelligence.

>score zero
Regular IQ tests are only valid in the 70-130 range. Then you need specialised tests to measure scores outside of the range. But an IQ of zero would suggest someone is greater than six sigmas below the average, so below 99.99966% of the population (five nines).... so it is statistically very unlikely that such a person exists.

>>509445546
Yeah, [expresses doubt]. Most Nepalese I've met (not a lot, but a few, maybe half a dozen or so) are of middling intelligence. Not geniuses, but not idiots. Definitely well above black Africans.

>>509454983
>midwit detected

>>509456654

Have you met black Africans? I have and they seem to be regular people to me. Not retarded like we like to think

>>509445721
Secret geniuses, fuck off with your gay jew tests that end up destroying our children and culture.
Ogga booga take test for banana master?