>>509464014 Britain has a king now. Does the British state not spy on its citizens? Are there no blacks living in Britain? Regardless, what I said is that a king doesn't relieve tyranny not that a king is the only source of tyranny.
>>509464695 Well did any British kings ever hold any power in your opinion? What did they do to prevent what I think you implicitly agreed is the rather sorry state of modern Britain? Or Canada for that matter? I appreciate the point that if we were ruled by angels an absolute monarchy would be perfect but that's not the case.