Thread 509466317 - /pol/ [Archived: 639 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: NLOKsU+nAustralia
7/4/2025, 7:41:07 AM No.509466317
1750561813445300
1750561813445300
md5: 055f1bc0f0783699a2d4746559fdb16c🔍
what are the political implications of this seismic shift?
Replies: >>509467928 >>509468218 >>509468282 >>509468395 >>509468424 >>509468551 >>509469044 >>509469132
Anonymous ID: AEHnQlbVAustralia
7/4/2025, 8:10:57 AM No.509467928
1711596809186835_thumb.jpg
1711596809186835_thumb.jpg
md5: b0dd594ce8c1e873e6c12d7f471d4bea🔍
>>509466317 (OP)
There is none. Normal fags subconsciously adopting *current thing* as a tactic to ensure their position in society is validated and non threatening as a means to access resources and a dating pool is nothing new.

TL:DR Greetings from Uluru, I hate women.
Anonymous ID: NbkzRdEnUnited States
7/4/2025, 8:16:37 AM No.509468218
>>509466317 (OP)
I guess I gotta get my sleeve tattoos removed and throw out my skinny jeans and cut off my broccoli hair
Anonymous ID: hpt21fyvPanama
7/4/2025, 8:17:41 AM No.509468282
>>509466317 (OP)
Manlet got off the gear. Good for him.
Anonymous ID: EsT9JWFpUnited States
7/4/2025, 8:19:24 AM No.509468395
>>509466317 (OP)
the second pic style is incelcore, see trannies, we are the top dogs now in the current times and your back to being freaks of nature lmao
Anonymous ID: PoLLWhhyUnited States
7/4/2025, 8:19:47 AM No.509468424
>>509466317 (OP)
While skinny jeans are gay af. I'm not going back to baggy shit. That looks terrible
Replies: >>509468781
Anonymous ID: C05896YS
7/4/2025, 8:22:14 AM No.509468551
>>509466317 (OP)
They look like shit now, physically speaking
Anonymous ID: +bkzh+nHUnited Kingdom
7/4/2025, 8:26:16 AM No.509468781
>>509468424
I've always been a slim cut or boot cut guy. Thought the ultra baggy trend in the late 90s and then the ultra skinny trend that's finally starting to die out now after far too long were both mega gay.
Anonymous ID: 7rWK+g8pRomania
7/4/2025, 8:31:31 AM No.509469044
>>509466317 (OP)
finally, maybe i won't have to either search 12 shops for a non-skinny or slim set of pants. At least one that is not overpriced at somewhere x5 times the cost just for the fucking brand. It still hurts to know I had to pay that much to get a classic one.
Replies: >>509469133
Anonymous ID: 5oz7mWUHPakistan
7/4/2025, 8:33:05 AM No.509469132
>>509466317 (OP)
they look slightly less faggy now
Anonymous ID: 7rWK+g8pRomania
7/4/2025, 8:33:05 AM No.509469133
>>509469044
>finally, maybe i won't have to either search 12 shops for a non-skinny or slim set of pants.
or have to take a few days of to go to the border and try my luck with the counterfeit smugglers.