>>509486483What the Roman Catholic Church did was that they compiled corrupt manuscripts from Alexandria, Egypt, known as Sinaiticus and Vaticanus (330 A.D.)
They basically compiled their OWN version of the Bible, and then they make it seem to you like there was no Bible before the RCC, which is a complete lie (Catholics love to lie.)
The Scriptures had already existed way before the RCC or any so-called "church father" (church babies).
The copies of the true Scriptures from Antioch, Syria, circulated over the Roman Empire in the first three centuries of church History, before any so called "council" or Catholic "church".
The Holy Scriptures were not a product of a Greek faculty at the North African Alexandria, Egypt; they were the result of thousands of Holy Spirit led Christians copying the New Testament Scriptures BY HAND.
No council ever made a canonical statement before the New Testament canon had already been fixed by the Holy Spirit led Bible-believers themselves (John 16:13 KJV,) of the first three church History centuries.
Besides, the Lord Jesus Christ HIMSELF already made the Old Testament canonical statements in Luke 24:44 (KJV,) clearly stated as being the law of Moses, and the prophets, and the psalms.
Should we then believe the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as the final Authority, or should we believe some council filled with a bunch of heretical pagans claiming to be "the church which Christ founded" ?
>Luke 24:44 KJV44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.