On the right, Neil Armstrongs alleged boot imprints on the moon soil.
On the left, an experiment conducted by the (((mythbusters))) in an attempt to prove a similar boot imprint could be achieved under laboratory conditions using a replica boot exactly like those worn by Neil and Buzz, a regolith soil stimulant, and all within a vacuum chamber to ensure an absence of moisture.
Remember the boot prints in the right photo were made on the moon where there is zero atmosphere and hence no moisture.
It is clear the experiment and the moon photos show completely different results. The photos on the right, could not have been taken in a moisture less environment.

>>509504505 (OP)
you would have to be an idiot to not believe we landed on the moon

>>509504505 (OP)
snow

>>509504505 (OP)
Neil had runny diarrhea and it got on the underside of his shoe.

>>509504656
and a full on retard to believe

>>509504656
Prove it

I don't think a lab test by a gimmick show will replicate the conditions in the moon, with no atmosphere and you know,in space

>>509504505 (OP)
i think its obvious that the moon landing was real but the footage was faked.

>>509504656
>>509504505 (OP)
you would genuinely have to be a total fucking retard to believe we landed on the moon

i wont even post any memes, the best way to prove to people the moon landing is fucking retarded is to just show them it, exactly how they showed it back in 1972. its attached in my related webm

this is allegedly the lunar module leaving the moon in 1972. and after this, NASA destroyed the technology to go back, and in 2025 with fifty years of technology improvements, what is your guess for how far we've sent a human being into "outer space"?

i genuinely would like you to stop, take a second, and guess before you keep reading. i'll re-ask the question: how far do you think we've sent a real human to the moon since after 1972?

the answer is.. less than 1/1000th of the distance. less than 0.1% of the distance to the moon. so.. the US government (who is notoriously deceptive and evil) wants you to believe that in 1972 they landed freemasons on the moon to play golf, then they destroyed the technology to go back (that's a quote from NASA astronaut don pettit), and with a DAILY budget of $70,000,000 every day of every week of every month of every year since 1972.. we haven't sent a human back 0.1% of the distance to the moon, which isn't really very far at all

hmm..... any free thinkers in the chat? anyone here think MAYBE there is some deception happening, MAYBE we aren't getting the full picture, MAYBE someone isn't telling the truth here?

so what do you think, do you think it ended up being exactly like they showed on television and told us on the news?

>>509505954
so why do you think they haven't come clean then? why do you think they still lie about it 50 years later? should we trust NASA and the US government if they willingly deceived everybody on earth regarding the authenticity of the footage? they've gone back several times and reiterated how it was actual footage and how it was captured and all that. if you found out it WAS all fake footage, what gives you the confidence to be able to say it really happened still?

>>509504656
There is zero doubt that we landed on the moon. They left shit behind that made triangulating trips to the moon easier, you can see shit from telescopes in space and so on.

Did humans land on the moon? if they did, did they come back? is the insanely good video real? you can debate that as much as you want, no real evidence any of that shit is true

>>509505990
>countless boomers watched that webm on tv with their jaws agape

Foreign space agencies photographed the landing sites.
You're no different than a flat earther now.

>>509505593
>>509505786
you can see the flag with a telescope lmao
>>509505990
you didnt land on the moon, we did

>>509506106
the government went to the moon, the government also owns the only two satellites in space. the JWST and hubble are both owned by the same group of people that said they went to the moon. you haven't seen anything reflecting off the moon for yourself, and in fact no civilian ever has, nor is there any footage of it anywhere. so to me, it's not a legit source. it's kind of like how with covid the CDC has a non-profit attached to it called the CDC foundation, who receives billions in funding from pfizer, moderna, j&j, etc. and in return, the CDC ends up telling everybody they NEED to get vaccinated. is it really a trustworthy source?

i'm at the point in my life where i really cannot believe in anything that anybody tells me unless i can prove it for myself. no human being has even been 0.1% of the distance to the moon since 1972, but i have to believe we're experts at putting up tens of thousands of satellites, predicting comet swarms 50 years in advance, etc? there's just a very high disconnect to me between humanities accomplishments in "outer space" vs our actual capabilities

>>509506106
>you can see shit from telescopes in space and so on.
Well no, no Earth telescope can definitively see lick. The LRO photographed it, but you have to actually trust NASA to believe thay picture is real so.

>>509506324
to be fair, we also need to realize it was the 70s. they didn't know what a computer was, they didnt know what video editing software was, they couldn't pause, zoom in, rewind, enhance, etc. there wasn't an internet of free discussion where skeptics could communicate. that being said though, i read something once that said even back in the 70s during a poll, something like 3/10 people didn't believe the moon landing footage was real at the time

Genuinely curious what it's like to live life as a drooling retard as this leaf(pajeet), must be quite the existence

>>509504656
kek sure

>>509506324
By 1972 nobody gave a shit about the Moon landings lol, doubti it was even in TV.

>>509505593

Cope, chump

>>509506358
prove it and post some footage of the flag on the moon with a telescope, this is such an out of touch with reality claim that you will never be able to subtantiate

by the way, there is no "we". stop saying "we" landed on the moon, who is "we"? when you say "we" it makes it sound like you were there, or had any part in it

>>509506106
>you can see shit from telescopes in space and so on.
Link a video of an amateur astronomer verifying this.

>>509506358
>you can see the flag with a telescope lmao
Link a video.

>>509506483
why not ask me directly then, little bitch boy? my life is great, especially since i found the truth (that i was lied to via by childhood education, that all governments are evil and untrustworthy, and that the whole world is being manipulated into thinking there is no Creator an earth is not a special creation)

"the truth will set you free" is a cliche i've heard my entire life but it was only until i realized the truth (YHWH is salvation) that i realized i was actually free. free from the jewish mind tricks that were enslaving me since i was a child, before i had a chance to rationally think things out for myself and see the proof of claims for things like ww2, 9/11, the moon landing, the jfk assassination, etc

>>509506106
>you can see shit from telescopes in space
and that proves what? dumb ass nigger, not even the strongest telescope on earth can see SHIT, you can't convince me we just stopped going into deep space for 50+ years for no reason

>>509506079
4 nations have gone to the moon or sent probes to the moon and all confirmed the lander. they would have been the first to say they didn't see it. as to why they don't come clean, I have no idea.

>>509505990
For me, it's the post-moon interview where they all look like whipped dogs and say they don't remember much

>>509504505 (OP)
You're assuming there was zero moisture in the spacecraft and no condensation on their suits or boots. The mythbusters test is not equal to the actual conditions.

>>509506734
>4 nations have gone to the moon
Why did China use 1960s camera quality for their recent rover landing?
Authenticity?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpAwmVPT758

>>509505990
you're retarded. someone you love and respect, not random strangers online, needs to tell you this before you will believe it and get help

>>509506701
>you can't convince me we just stopped going into deep space for 50+ years for no reason
aliens, fag

>>509506870
Any moisture would've immediately evaporated in the vacuum.

>>509506734
if america as a nation is willing to lie about details regarding the moon landing, why wouldn't other nations do it as well?

you need to realize.. there is no such thing as "other nations". its not enough to say "the russians would have snitched!"

if you have a central banking system in your country, you're part of the jewish nation. its just simply how it works

the other nations are also raking in billions to trillions of dollars for their "space agencies". why would they snitch on eachother and ruin the grift?

we need to distance ourselves from the idea that our world leaders are separate interests. china isn't against the US. russia isn't against the US. these are just convenient adversaries because both sides profit immensely from endless war, violence, fear. fear is the best control tool, and the people who own this world know that. that's why they use the news and the idea of different countries at war to scare everybody. the only reason "other nations" exist in the lore they teach you is so they can put the little pawn pieces to war with eachother. the US (aka israeli) defense budget is one TRILLION dollars every year. if YOU were the US military.. why would you ever want the wars to stop? that means your paycheck stops. thus, the need for perpetual war becomes necessary. there is a direct parallel to what the governments are doing in outer space as well. there is a perpetual need to "explore space", because its (allegedly) an infinite vast expanse full of mystery. when they make it sound mysterious and empty, it makes you think "we could discover something amazing!" which makes you more okay with them taking $70,000,000 every single day from you. not to mention, fear is used commonly with space-news as it's always about aliens invading, meteors crashing, eclipses ending the world, the sun going supernova, etc

>>509505990
What is it about this webm that triggers autists so hard? They always start flapping their arms about it acting like there's something crazy about it.

>>509505990
>NASA destroyed the technology to go back
No, it more like the group that did it and the infrastructure is gone. You could say the same thing for something like the 1970's Pontiac Trans Am. The forms are gone, the design team is gone. Yet you could make newer one.
You and others just did understand what was being said because you're poorly educated. So you think everything is a literal statement. It takes all of a few min searching around to get the context but of course you didn't bother.

>>509506373
>haven't seen anything reflecting off the moon
It's a laser reflector you idiot. You can still bounce off it now..
https://wtop.com/science/2019/07/the-experiment-still-running-on-the-moon-and-tv-re-runs-50-years-later/

>>509506849
post some of them

>>509507055
not if it's on a surface

>>509506849
again...
>>509507054
because they saw aliens. they were shook and couldn't talk about it