>>509508779>This echoes with the struggles humans face in their life.maybe.
But there is nothing philosophical about it.
The only way you can turn this philosophical, and even that barely, is if you were to make the argument that succumbing to his emotins and giving up could have been the right choice. Because otherwise, this shit is way too fucking cliche and cookie cutter to be of value to anyone other than the most genuinely subhuman.
Krishna's POV again, is completely devoid of any kind of philosophical arc LOL.
Someone witnessed a god imparting a "dharma"? Something the book absolutely refrains from delving deeper into? LOLOLOLOL. What a waste of time.
>how he should be prepared for inevitable human dilemmas he will face in lifeagain makes zero mention, of what kind. Forget about this garbage being useless, its more creatively bankrupt than marvel capeshit slop.
>nature of realitysomehow, did a worse job than buddha, despite being superficially transcendantal. After harping on about how devoid of substance this shit was so far, we have arrrived at the first...anything of note.
The nature of reality.
Now we can move on to judge on if its good, right, useful etc. or not.
And its utter dogshit. The whole religion, which can be exemplified in the kind of attitude required to come up with a cope concept as "kali yuga", can be said to be entirely one big cope for "why life bad".
And there is no "explanation" for atman.
It is just stated and not elaborated on, at all.
>>509508779>from a prerequiste that anyone who doesn't believe in it are predisposed not to believe in ithehehe, you did NOT come up with this line of bullshit on your own. You dont sound high iq enough (as shown by your cope attempts at trying to gaslight people and yourself, that there is anuthing philosophical in krishna's story) Elaborate on why you have arrived at this conclusion.