>>509505634 (OP)Here's how you know porn isn't actually bad for you: no one criticizes female erotica. If porn was actually bad for you, female erotica would be just as bad or more so because of the "men dead, women most affected" effect in media. You hear nothing about it, despite some women consuming porn, and all of them using erotica. When you do, it's always POSITIVELY framed. Therefor porn cannot be objectively bad for you, because it isn't for women.
Fun fact: the whole "sex object" thing is done by both genders, yet you ONLY hear about men doing it thanks to feminists. Women do it as well, but you never hear about it.
The harsh reality is porn and video games are providing needs coverage to men in a society that HATES men and wishes to deny them all of their needs. You see this from top to bottom of the hierarchy of needs. Porn covers sexual needs, video games covers competency needs via simulated competence.
Women get WIC/EBT/SNAP funds for food. Men starve or go to a food bank.
Women get housing support from various entities for shelter. Men are homeless.
Women have erotica, dildos, vibes, fucking machines, and men at their beck and call for sex. Men at least have porn here, and FINALLY some fleshlights (dildos are WAY older than fleshlights).
Women have social support systems, shelters, and every fellow female is part of the sisterhood. Males have nothing. Hence loneliness crisis.
Society promotes the girlboss in media, does DEI hiring, does AA, biases schools in favor of women, courts don't prosecute women, all to provide MAXIMUM lift to women who can't do shit. Meanwhile men are suppressed, called monsters/peods, held down, punished unfairly, falsely accused, assumed guilty at all times (Dullith model), and fucked over. Any man who has made it made it with grit and determination in a system that hated him.
So bottom line - anyone attacking porn, video games, or anything "male" is just the standard sexist cunt.