Do rich whites have a moral obligation to protect poor whites?

>>509521822 (OP)
Whites have a moral obligation to protect whites.
Money are secondary.

You are part of a society. And society makes you rich. So it's only appropriate to give back to it.

In Rotterdam there is some rich guy who pays off 1000 peoples debts off in Rotterdam every year. That's pretty cool.

>>509521822 (OP)
humanity has the moral obligation to erase poverty

>>509521822 (OP)
Recent history shows that unless your society goes full on toleration you either take care of the lower classes or you risk social unrest and heads being severed from their rich owners bodies. The exceptions are places that have a soulless population like Russia and China. They have a slave mentality there.

No but poor whites can rob your ass and rape you all the same. Don’t forget…we make the world turn. Drive your trucks, pick your trash up, catch your shrimp and seafood, put meat and food on your table

>>509521947
But helping people doesn't have to be purely altruistic. There are also win-win situations imaginable. Like how some large tech businesses build houses without an aim for profit, but also without making losses.

>>509521822 (OP)
One of the initial idiocies that helped kikes gain wealth were christians donating to the kikes who invented the bullshit.
Arguably, Whites have no obligation to beyond improving their community, and if possible, their country, but they should have a fucking obligation not to fund their enemies.

>>509521822 (OP)
No? No shit?
Like have you seen that big beautiful blunder and what's in it?
Whites would rather "own the libs" than help themselves

>>509521822 (OP)
whites should only be focusing on perpetuating the interests of other whites. "protect" is the wrong term, you don't have to directly "protect" random white people you don't know but you should be working towards things that are collective in the interests of white people in general.