An empire, by definition, is when one ethnic group rules at least one other ethnic group. The ethnic groups can be of different races or the same race, but they have different cultures.
When different groups of people are in proximity to each other, they mix together sexually because the libido is so strong that people, inevitably, will forget whatever taboos there are against mixing just for the chance to have a twenty second orgasm. Ergo, every time different groups live side by side or together, they mix together. No matter how strong the taboo or law against mixing it, the mixing remains inevitable.
Look at the antebellum South, where white masters mixed with slave women, or at the South under Jim Crow, where race mixing still occurred. The sex drive overpowers any taboo or law.
The only way to maintain ethnic, including racial, homogeneity is to remain isolated geographically and cut off from other groups. Living together means mixing together, and since empires bring together different ethnicities or nations in a single overarching political entity, this means empires necessarily become mixed, ethnically.
The original race of any empire is bound to become mixed and bound to disappear. It happened to the Athenians and Romans, not to mention their Bronze Age forebears in the Near East like the Babylonians and Akkadians. It is happening, now, to the British, French, Americans etc.: the modern European empires.
The wages of sin is death. Imperialism is a crime, a sin, and nature punishes it with the death of the original ethnicity that founded the empire.

>>509596499 (OP)
Whats with these shit tier ai slop threads?

>>509596499 (OP)
And no, Greeks and Italians today are not racially the same as the Greeks and Italians of the Classical Period.

>>509596597
Soulless people seeking (you)s

>>509596597
Does the truth offend you?

Odd that you use Britain as your example, a case study in NOT mixing, and not say, Spain. Britain's colonies were mostly administrative and the ones that were settled (North America, Australasia) were segregated and not mixed.

>>509596680

Italy is a dumpster fire because they're culturally Tuscan faggots, not because they have brown hair.

>>509596787
This. Mixing only became a thing in Anglo countries after America claimed the world throne.

>>509596787
My point is the British themselves are now being mixed in Britain, not that the British maintained separation from colonized peoples in the colonies.
Look at Britain today: a big multicultural mess. The British people will mix with the migrants, inevitably, and like the original Romans become swarthy and darker.

>>509597212
You dont have a point. If you did you would have used more clear cut examples as anon said instead of ahistorical cope about the UK and buckbreaking fantasies about the american south straight out of the mind of tarantino.

>>509597212
That has nothing to do with empire. Ireland is being mixed, as is Sweden and any number of other non-colonial countries. That's globalism and jews, something you have a large part in spreading.

>>509597428
You just don't wish to see my point. It's very clear. When different groups are put together, they inevitably mix.
And yes, all of Europe, even countries without an empire in the past, is getting mixed, but it's all due to the history of empire that defined the great powers of Europe in the past. Britain even favors former colonial peoples for immigration, meaning Indians, Pakistanis etc. have a relatively easier time emigrating to Britain than Americans do.

>>509597447
The best thing any country can do, if it wants to maintain its culture and race, is to remain isolated and, in policy, isolationist. Military expansionism has always come at the cost of racial and cultural mixing. Empires and wars are great mix-masters.

>>509596499 (OP)
Most empires aren’t fighting on ethnicity so much a an agenda set by the leadership. If Trump told you we needed to fuck niggers to forward his agenda you’d be on board. As it stands, whites alright for now. Political convenience rather than reality.

>>509597719
Yup. Let the world move on without you. Become some relic for a museum. Best thing to do for you culture is dump the relics and move on.

>>509597760
It has nothing to do with the agenda of the empire. I'd guess most empires are created because conquering brings in resources and cheap labor, which enrich the colonial metropole.
But no matter why a country pursues conquest, when people are brought together they end up mixing together culturally and genetically.

>>509596499 (OP)
>fate of empires

>>509596499 (OP)
>self destruct

>>509598003
The question is whether to remain isolated and backward, yet pure, or to advance but accept racial and genetic change.
Everything in the universe is a double-edged sword. Every good thing comes with a cost and every dark cloud has a silver lining. Pick your poison.

>>509597638
I see your point but as stated its so simplistic it comes across like you just asked grok. Put groups together and they will mix. Yeah and? Literally every ethnic group on earth is the product of mixing with another group. You kinda need that because the human generic diversity is really low. Thats why isolated groups of humans quickly suffer from the effects of inbreeding. It has fuck all to do with empire. Some of the most mutted places in europe right now had little or no empire. Canada never had an empire and look at it now.

>>509596680
The Germans and Brits of this day are not the ones from 300 years agp