>>509637714... what?
>>509637832And yet even a fraction of its total population is more threatening than all of these other problematic countries. The world, quite literally, revolves around America whether you like it or not. Now, are you done making an absolute fool out of yourself?
>>509637629 (OP)The answer is simple- "why would they"? Most countries that aren't aligned with America, Nato, or the West otherwise, are only aligned with each other in spirit, and even then barely that. Most of those countries are shit-tier because they quite literally don't have the natural resources or a people with enough potential required to build their countries up into anything of true value. The only nations on that side worth a damn are China, and Russia, and they all rely on the US either directly or indirectly to a massive degree to simply exist. Globally unmatched American consumerism in China's case, and a false scarecrow for Putin to scare his people into unity under him in Russia's case. With that in mind, all the other countries on their side are veritably useless shitholes with no particular value to them. Hence they're "spiritual allies" at best. Why would they risk angering a world power that's actually beneficial to them to help a country that offers them nothing except future problems (Russia and China know full well sandniggers prospering and spreading across the globe is bad for everyone, themselves included). Considering what little they get out of their fellow Bricks nations or unaffiliated spiritual allies, they're quite simply better off ignoring anything that isn't an actual attack on them.