Why right-wingers don't want to admit that current climate change is caused by humans burning fossil fuels and raising huge amount of cattle which releases methane?


MTG: I’m Introducing A Bill To Ban Weather Control Because God Didn’t Create The Deadly Floods In Texas.

https://www.joemygod.com/2025/07/mtg-im-introducing-a-bill-to-ban-weather-control-because-god-didnt-create-the-deadly-floods-in-texas/

CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 0.04%, or 1 nigger per 2,500 Whites. I think we'll be alright.

>>509642545
Methane concentration is 0.0002%, or 1 nigger per 50,000. Scary.

>>509642545
A single drop of some inks can turn an entire bucket of water black. So you can't just assert things based solely on percentage, the specifics matter.

>>509641585 (OP)
>Why right-wingers don't want to admit that current climate change is caused by humans burning fossil fuels and raising huge amount of cattle which releases methane?

Because, the calculations are more in line with the climate alarmists forgetting to address the impact of concrete on their measurements. The same goes with oceanic temperature rise. This explains why the ice caps are growing when seemingly, temperatures are rising. That's why.

>>509642861
Life on earth would be impossible without CO2.

>>509643006
If its so important I propose we increase it to 100%

>>509643458
No, that would be insane. It's plant food, and those plants give us oxygen. What you should be asking is how much is the absolute minimum we need so plants and trees can survive. If you were intelligent, that is.

>>509641585 (OP)
Climate science is largely fabricated.
You have people making models based on data they made a year ago on years that happened 500+ years ago. We didnt have the ability or want to record temperatures.

Climate science is much like evolutionary science. People make models of thousands if not millions of years ago. Entirely based on what they see today so it boils down to them making up data to make their hypothesis "accurate".

>>509641585 (OP)
I don’t care about your excuse to enact eco communism.
>>509642545
CO2 pre-carboniferous used to be 8000ppm. If we burned the worlds reserves of fossil fuels, we’d be fine.
All of this ignores that free markets have feedbacks; if something is causing a problem, the free market adapts to solve it. We don’t need an all powerful god-state.

>>509641585 (OP)

> Why right-wingers don't want to admit that current climate change is caused by humans burning fossil fuels and raising huge amount of cattle which releases methane?

Either because they're paid by fossil fuel companies to say it isn't (if they're smart) or because they believe it's not because someone who was paid by fossil fuel companies said so (if they're stupid)

/pol largely falls in the second category

>>509645017
This ppm bullshit is exactly why no-one knows the CO2 concentration. You can ask any normie and they won't have a clue. Not even in the right ballpark. 8000 ppm = 0.8%. Now we can all visualise it. Just a bit under 1%. Sounds manageable. The methane that OP wanked on about is measured in ppb. Parts per billion. 5000 ppb sounds like a disaster. We're all going to die, aaaaarrrrgggghhhh.

>>509645192
>>509641585 (OP)
What is the deal with serbians having bad opinions? Are you guys vpn bots? Or are these the thoughts of your people?

>>509641585 (OP)
Because fossil fuel companies give massive amounts of money to pump out propaganda and bribe politicians. The other factor is that Conservatism is backward and clings on to the past instead of looking to the future. Ban Conservatives and the West will progress.

>>509645310
>Progress

>>509641585 (OP)
Right wingers don't mind science.
They dislike that the left uses this as an excuse to implement policies which restrict freedom, increase bureaucracy, and push everyone into poverty.
If the left really wanted to stop climate change, they would implement different policies. This is just an excuse for state control and meddling with your private lives.

>>509645279

Surprisingly enough but the stubborn / defiant culture here results in a large diversity of opinions, not entirely unlike how people are in US in that regard. Individuals aren't afraid to go against the grain and there really isn't that much conformism so "thoughts of my people" are far from uniform

We have a shit ton of climate change deniers as well as nazis, liberals, communists, fag right activists, vegans, conservatives, homophobes etc.

But what I said is not really a matter of opinion btw, it's undeniably true that fossil fuel lobbies pay grifters to spread climate change denialism in order to preserve profits. I don't even know how is that surprising if you know anything about history, capitalism or how either of them work

It's caused by asphalt dissipating heat.
No one is going to stop building roads though.
No I won't provide a source.

>>509645559
You don't seem to have a very nuanced or varied opinion. It reads like every other communist opinion.

I don't think anyone still believes in climate change. It's super cringe.

>>509641585 (OP)
>THIS TOTALLY ISNT A COMMONLY KNOWN FLOODPLAIN THE CLIMATE IS CHANGING IM LOSING MY MIND AHHHHHHHH

>>509642861
>ITS NEVER FLOODED IN THIS WELL KNOWN COMMONLY FLOODED AREA

>>509645738

I don't really see a space for nuance when debating objective fact like "fossil fuel lobbies paid people / scientists to supress evidence for man-made climate change and spread doubt against it"

Like that's proven where is the nuance about a clear historic, documented fact? And they're still doing it, billionaires like Farris and Dan Wilks are still doing it through pragerU and similar propaganda outlets. What nuance is there?

>>509645922
>you can't use money to argue
If that were true climate change would have never been invented.

>>509641585 (OP)
Even retarded libtards and lefties had to admit that isn't true.

>>509641585 (OP)
I get fossil fuels but do cattle really add that much to climate change?

>>509646268
exactly as much

>>509646002

Where did I say you can't? I said that you can and it's being done and you attacked me (and "my people" lol) for it, because it's a "bad opinion"

>>509646342
>actually it's ok
That wasn't me.

>>509641585 (OP)
>raising huge amount of cattle which releases methane
Agriculture in general is a much smaller part of pollution.
>CTRL+F nuclear
>0 results

>>509641585 (OP)
>current climate change
climate has always been changing faggot

>>509641585 (OP).

Compare 1776, and now. Hypothetically, nothing changed given the circumstance.

>>509641585 (OP)
Because it's actually deforestation, wetland filling/draining, and EVERY other type of actual toxic pollutant that isn't air for plants.
Immediately following TKD/TND should be a worldwide TBP or Total Beaver Proliferation.

>>509643544
Reddit take

>>509645738
Amerijew spews his indoctrination