Why do right-wingers have such a retarded understanding of how genetics and ancestry works?

>>509646169 (OP)
What's your criticism here?
The guy is correct.

Isn't this trivially true? Your child is going to have half their genes from you and half their genes from their mother, the more genetically distant the mother is from you the more genetically distant the child will be

>>509646241
>>509646315
This is not correct. It conflates ancestry (deep historical origins) with direct genetic relatedness (parent-child relationships). Parents share approximately 50% of their DNA with their biological children, while they share virtually 0% with random strangers of any ethnicity.Genetic relatedness is measured by actual shared DNA segments, not by broad ancestral categories.

If you need a marrow transplant a white stranger would be a closer match than your mixed race kid.

>>509646547
Whatever helps you cope.

>>509646547
Two white people have very similar dna. An asian or african's dna is so different that the resulting offspring is less similar than a random white child to the white spouse.

>>509646760
Source?

>>509646547
In the grand scheme of things, all it means is that a random white kid is more related, but a mixed kid is still closely related to you, just not as much as a random white kid.

>>509646547
>while they share virtually 0% with random strangers of any ethnicity.
You are so fucking stupid I'm not even going to correct you.

>>509646547
You're jewish

>>509646856
Race mixing is beautiful and more and more people are doing it everyday
The only one needing to cope here is you

>>509646547
Cope Tranny

>>509647029
>Race mixing is beautiful
I disagree, kike. Just look at america.

>>509646938

https://www.nmdp.org/get-involved/join-the-registry/ethnicity-and-diversity-matter

>>509646931
>>509646993
>>509647002
>>509647104

>Two white people have very similar dna
Every human has similar DNA (99.8% similarly). If you have a common ancestry (i.e. same race) that's still only an extra 0.1% similarity.

The claim that you'd be "more genetically related to a random White stranger than your own child if you miscegenate" is mathematically impossible. Even if you and a random person of similar ancestry share an extra 0.1% of DNA due to distant common ancestors, that's still vastly less than the 50% you share with your biological child.

>>509647147
Nothing here supports your claim.

>>509647112
Americans are more attractive than Europeans exactly because of the race mixing

>>509646547
>t. jewish nigger mutt

>My nigger son looks lust like me!
This is dumb. Goodbye.

>>509647161
stop debating with me. You are wrong.

Just look at a mixed kid compared to a white. kid. They don't look like you, a random white kid is more similar to you. That's all the proof I need. But genetic science also backs me up. we are 98% genetically similar to pigs, so don't try and fool me with percentages. You simply don't understand genetics and are flailing around with nonsense.

>>509646547
>resorting to semantics
Cope.

>>509647104
This isn't even correct, Africans are closer genetically to Whites than Asians

>>509647029
Go away brazil. You’re a shithole.

>>509647161

Every blue eyed person on the planet is descended from one woman, 9,000ish years ago. That's just a mutation which turns off the melanin production in the iris. More common in Whites than other races, but seen across all other races. Europeans are a unique facet of humanity and do indeed share more DNA with their own haplotype and haplogroup than other groups thanks to evolution. That natural process didn't magically stop because it's convenient for your "argument". I do indeed have more genetically in common with a random Icelandic person than I do with a random Sub-Saharan African or East Asian person. The chances of having commonality and close familial relations just 1,000 years ago are almost 100%.

The most important thing to realize is that genetics is not a quantity but a quality.

There’s no point counting percent. For instance, I’m genetically closer to any male than a female, regardless of race or familial connection.

>>509647104
This doesn't seem right.
Abos are basically another species and we know almost every African group has had significant mixing with Euros and Asians over the last hundreds of years.

Then again it says Jeets are closer to the Greeks than North Africans are, despite the fact that Greeks and Italians were fucking their way up and down the Med, so I'm not sure I can take any of this seriously in a modern context.

>>509647195

"Your"

There are IDs on this board for a reason.

https://caamedia.org/blog/2018/11/15/mixed-match-focuses-on-need-for-multiracial-bone-marrow-donors/

>>509646169 (OP)
this is only true if White woman miscegenate
Any racemixing done by White man will always result in White offspring.

>>509646169 (OP)

Actually it is you who are retarded. While it is true that a child has 50% of their genes from their parents, the vast majority of those genes from a same species partner will still be similar to others of your species. Even somebody who is related to you has a lot of genetic similarity to you. When you mate outside of your species, half of those genes now are distant from your own genes. Sequencing calculates genes similarity. It does not account for origin, just total sequence similarity.

>>509647491

Humans are all one species when they can interbreed with one another, retard. Even the Denisovans and Neanderthals were humans. They're mixed into everyone except for Sub-Saharan Africans. They aren't related to the rest of humanity in the ways you think. 20% of their genome is "Ghost DNA" from a now extinct hominid that NO OTHER PEOPLE on the planet are related to. Truly, they're the missing link between ancient humans and modern man.

>>509647293
You lost this argument anon. Sounding like a reeing pig

>>509646169 (OP)
when two white people create offspring, they are, genetically speaking, creating nearly clones of themselves.
when a white and black create offspring, they are creating hybrids of themselves.

>>509647161
You onions-drinking faggot, just kill yourself.

>>509646547

No. Sequencing does not evaluate ancestry. At all. A sequence of ATCATGG found in you compared to a random neighbor with the same sequence will both be treated as identical.

>>509646547
Mix yellow and blue, you get green. Is green yellow? No. Does green stand out in a neighbourhood of yellows? Yes. Does the yellow look more like the other yellows compared the green mutt despite green being half yellow? Yes.

>>509647161
>99.8% similarly
This is actually not much in the grand scheme of DNA
You have actually zero clue what you're talking about
The chart in OP is called a PCA chart, it looks at the most relevant two genetic factors which determine the groupings of the races
The edit to the chart and the implications are not totally correct, as we're not sure how the variables might change given the dna mixing and matching as a consequence of race mixing but you can think of race as a sort of extended family group.
When you introduce members that are genetically distant, the average distance increases, now its not possible to be 100% certain of how much it'd change but its totally possible that the edit is correct.
0.2% of dna difference is actually quite large, 10x that difference is enough to account for the genetic distance between humans and chimps.

>>509647491
>>509647596
>>509647600
>>509647612
>>509646169 (OP)

None of you had any background in genetics and stuff. Why bother? Thats like listening to a farmer talking about nuclear physics

>>509647310
No

>>509647612
Picrel.

>>509646547
True. DNA illiterate chuds BTFO

>>509647704

>unless a piece of paper from a university says you're an expert, you're not worth listening to

It's it time to start pickpocketing tourists?

>>509647758
what book is this from

>>509647293
> we are 98% genetically similar to pigs
Google just Google please because this is wrong because that's closer to chimps not pigs

>>509647596

If your argument is that one needs to be of the same species to interbreed then you are wrong. Look up the term hybrid. I like that I triggered you by suggesting that non-white mixtures were across species though.

>>509646547
>conflates ancestry (deep historical origins) with direct genetic relatedness
genetic theory did that a long time ago

>>509646241
Stop being retarded, ancestry is "measured" by a few mitochondrial DNA genes out of the tens of thousands of genes you carry. Your child will always carry 50% of your genes, so obviously they are the closest people to you genetically (other than your parents).

>>509647720
>Different data than the previous chart
You would think for something based in cold hard science they'd have similar results instead of seemingly random bullshit.

>>509647902

There is no argument, you're talking to yourself at this point. Denisovans and Neanderthals were humans and live inside of everyone on earth except for Sub-Saharan Africans. Sub-Saharan Africans are the missing link between ancient humans and modern man.

>>509647822
Dawn of the Day by Nietzsche

>>509647704

Speak for yourself retard. I have literally programmed a Smith-Waterman matrix to compare global versus local sequencing alignment. The OP is scientifically illiterate and so are you if you can't follow this basic shit.

>>509647629
How does science explain the coincidence?

>>509647992
The chart in OP is a PCA chart, its used to find variables to group data properly, what you're looking at is merely some of the variables considered
Stop pretending like you know jack fucking shit

>>509646547
we have a stupid nigger here. look at him and laugh.

right wingers actually believe in microchimerism because their wives fuck black men constantly and they have to raise black babies lmao

>>509647161

>>509647795
Listen you overzealous cocksucker. You will never be taken seriously when trying to talk about nuclear physics,surgery,economics,medicine etc. before you have gained the ability to sit in a fucking class for 120 minutes to listen to a lecture and then done it again and again for 4 years. You dont fucking know shit and are more arrogant than people who vastly out-read you. And you know how I know this? Because ive been on this site for many gears and you all talk the same tired old talking points. Youre mentally stuck in high school. Get a fucking book and improve your arguments at the very least.

>>509647994

When did I bring up any of these ancient hominids. I said that sequencing doesn't evaluate ancestory. It evaluates sequencing similarities. Do you even know what a comparison matrix is? If you breed with somebody distant from you then close to you, then you accumulate a lot more sequence dissimilarity. The case about outside your species is illustrative. If you don't get this then go back to basic biology. Try to understand that chromosomes are not the same as genes.

>>509646547
>>509647161
get a load of this fucking jew

>>509648022
None of the things you are talking about even resemble genetics. Youre just playing with images at this point. And genetics isnt a toy its used for medical reasons only. Its not ethical to use it for any other reason,besides maybe ancestry and ancestry isnt about racism

>>509647222
Lol what? Which 'Americans' are you talking about?

>>509646547
>while they share virtually 0% with random strangers of any ethnicity

but i thought we were 99.9% geneically the same and there was only one race, the human race?

>>509648168
>waste life
>still dumb
Must be rough.

God made humans in His image. All humans, not just ones who look like you.

>>509648168
I like how this clown's flag has all the clown colors lmao

>>509648418
Where do you suggest they should have been made?

>>509648168

Stopped reading with the profanities.

>>509648221

I understand haplogroups

>>509646547
haha y-yeah

>>509647794
>Razib Khan
>White

>>509648418
This pretty much ends the argument. Christianity is as Jewish as it gets.

Christians are just goy slaves to Jews, Christians are absolutely pathetic beyond words can express. You're a willing, idiotic slave.

Abrahamism is a blight on humanity, an anti-life and anti-nature death cult

>>509647596
>Humans are a species even neanderthal and denisovans
Lmao
Maybe try taxonomy before genetics retard

>>509648522
Eh? What do you mean?

>>509648043
I was comparing these two, Mr negro.
>>509647720
>>509647104
I don't doubt there are genetic differences, but it seems to me like a lot of the research into the topic is tainted by people who want their favored groups clustered or who want to prove we're all not so different.
So you can have one where Jeets are basically white and another where west Africans are more in common with Europeans than the Latinos who only exist because of Euros fucking their way through the Americas.
You should cool it with the black rage though.

>>509648611
I'm not reading any of that. Be blessed and go in peace.

>>509648530
You arent worthy of polishing my boots with your tongue

ITT cope and seethe because humans are having sex with each other and increasing genetic diversity

>>509648302

Are you confusing me with another poster? None of that is germane to what I said. Suffice it to say, if you breed with somebody who shares 99% of genes with you then your offspring will have 99.5% similarity with you (on average). Breed with a 90% and your offspring will be 95% similar to you. The 50% argument notwithstanding, a same group 99% individual would be closer to you in that situation.

Overall, the majority of the human species is similar but there are sub groups that have specific gene clusters which are dramatically different. Depending on what genes you look at, you can generate plots that show a high difference.

Ancestory is not what gene comparison is about. Phyllogenies can be predicted by genetic similarity but that is not strictly accurate due to convergent evolution and horizontal gene transfer. All a sequence comparison does is tell you whether two sequences are similar.

>>509648688
The Bible is self-serving jewish trash

>>509648641
>God made man in his image
>I make dinner in the kitchen
Is there somewhere else you'd rather be?

>>509648474
>>509648406

Im willing to bet but Im not sure that youd confuse even the asshole (anus in medical terms) and the vagina (or how you puny imbeciles call it "pussy") if it wasnt for some basic anatomy books that YOUR WIVES READ FOR YOU Hahahahahahaha

>>509648586
has a white wife

>>509646315
That graph is a 2-gene axis and exposes Lewontin's fallacy. It does not represent the entire child's genome. It is likely correct, but you couldn't say with certainty off a 2-gene axis like this that the child's genetic makeup would be entirely like this.
In the instance of miscegenating with an African, sometimes the gene would be all the way to the left, sometimes a different gene would be all the way to the right. Other times, it may be in the middle somewhere.
This does not mean one should miscegenate.

>>509648782
lol u r so dumb

>>509646169 (OP)
A mixed child's whole genome will be far more distinct/unique than that of a non-mixed child, i.e. my non-mixed child is far more similar to me than your non-mixed child is to you.
This is a matter of fact.

>>509648575
>article about bone marrow transplants somehow finds a way to bring up the holocoaster

>>509647293
Lol this board is such a good source of comedy
You guys really come on here and assert all this nonsense about every topic and have no clue how stupid you sound/are
You probably think carnivore diet is healthy, gas yourself with healing chlorine, think the moon landings were fake because of something about shadows, and also unironically make fun of vegan Emilies who believe in the healing power of crystals without a smidgeon of irony

>>509648418
They had to call other humans animals or else their religious cope makes no sense.

>>509648748
Look at Race mixing in Brazil, it was about white men having sex with non-white women, so their mixed offspring mostly assimilated into white culture.

But still they have more than 60 thousand homicides per year, less than 1% cases being solved by police that are called racists even though most of the police force is black or brown working class people tired of crime.

This is your diversity, they have an Iraq War of body count per year even though they have gun control.
Never let that happen to you.

There will always be the "other". Race mixing would decimate worldwide IQ and mankind would revert to tribalism within 7 generations.

Race mix all you want, and you'll get a group of people with similar DNA characteristics who can find some way to hate certain members of the group.
No matter how extensive the race mixing becomes, you'll never drive out the evolutionary reaction to the "other". Humans are tribal and even if we are smart enough to perceive each other as from the same genetics, we would just discriminate based on something else, like location.

Then you get Africa, which is made up of very similar DNA trait populations, but yet they kill each other mercilessly.
You're not seeing the big picture here, there is no end game to race mixing. Blacks hate light skinned blacks. Whites hate even mixed """"whites"""" who share similar culture some of the time.

Unless you can evolve the human mind to be aware enough to recognize a group larger than a tribe of 200-500 as their own people, you'll never achieve anything by making the world brown.
Far less actually, than if you segregated people to their own countries.

Civilization can only occur with IQ's >~90

Lower IQ means higher crime because people with low IQ cant think of the long term consequences of their actions.

We are not all one race.

Africans lack the 6% Neanderthal DNA Western Europeans have. They are literally Human 1.0.

>>509648771
There is no such thing as a pure individual,or its very rarely the case,just like there is no such thing as a pure presentation of any disease,illness and ailment. Therefore the percentages that you are talking about only have to be gross estimations. And while its true that within the genus homo sapiens sapiens there is a lot of diversity and no 2 human groups are the same,it is imperative to consider that even if 2 people of vastly different genetic heritage have a child,it is statistically less relevant what either parent brings to the table because the baby will inherit 2 alleles,2 copies of every single gene one from the mother and one from the father and many traits that people in here boast about are polygenetic meaning that theres multiple genes controlling eye colour,skin colour,iq etc. and while this can be simplified with those IXth grade drawings with blue eyes and brown eyes,there is also the case that certain positive or pathological traits such as blood group (A,B,O) can be inherited in a non mendelian way. Its called the bombay phenotype for example. Its more complicated that thinking that IQ and phenotype and genetic proximity change rapidly because of that. And what would this argument even probe in a century of nation states? We arent in 800 AD where people said you have 1% of peasant dna therefore youre not of royal blood. Our societies are diverse and have vastly different ethnic group and racial purity is extremely stupid especially in North america where everyone is mixed

Its more important not to have a dick baby which theres dozens of different diseases

>WELL BUT ACKHTUALLY THE LEWONTIN'S FALLACY IS NOT A FALLACY

>>509646169 (OP)
They are the evident failure of western education system, we are all responsible for this.

We let a lot of people know a little, enough to make them think they have a say in everything, not enough to make what they say meaningful.

>>509648748
>despeciation actually increases genetic diversity!
Are you stupid?

>>509649107
So you agree White and East Asian race mixing is fine?

>>509649107
So just don't mix people with bad genes then. Obviously if you have kids with someone with shit genes you're going to downgrade your bloodline. So just choose someone good like a Nip girl. Race mixing isn't inherently good or bad. You could mix with a white Serb and end up with violent kids too.

>>509649500
>So just choose someone good like a Nip girl.
You're just saying this because you watch anime.

Reproduction is about leaving a copy of your genes.
The closest you can get is asexual reproduction.
Sexual reproduction is a compromise.
If you reproduce with someone less similar to you you just lose at life.

>>509646169 (OP)
Random white kid has a better chance beimg able to take my bone marrow but my own race mixed kid can't.

>>509648711

That's nice.

>>509647692
sorry chud
race science has been DEBUNKED

>>509646547
>they share virtually 0% with random strangers
>also believes that we share 50% DNA with a banana
"trust le science" fags are so fucking dumb

>>509649500
This is just naive and foolish.
Outbreeding is well known to generally be highly unpredictable, unstable, and result in a chaotic mix of various, distinct hybrids. Beyond pure genetics, the chaotic and destructive effects are also felt psychologically within individuals, socially, and beyond as such hybrids create instability within stable populations that are based on shared genetic and cultural identites that hybrids simply are not a part of.

>>509649084
Pew thanks You for your reverse psychology NOW I see the truth I Will becomes full vegan and eat ze Bugs take My shots and worship Neil Armstrong

Women dont care about this shit, all they know is the mutt has their DNA so us automatically good to them. Conservatards need to learn how to talk to women jesus fuck.

>>509649084

Nobody gives a fuck ,were being vilified in our own lands and as if thats not bad enough theres cunts like you talking shit on the internet doing nothing about it.

>haw haw check me guffawing!

prick!

>>509646547
Semantics cope to escape biological reality. Mating with the same race would make the child even more related to you, so your point is moot. Homogeneity frightens vermin because they know they deserve persecution

>>509647794
He’s unironically wrong because like most braincelles, he assumes genetics can be understod as a quantitative measurement. It simply can’t in a meaningful way. The exception here is if you do a parental test or explore ancestry.

Take a trait most people are familiar with, such as blue eyes. It is evident here, that two blue eyed parents will have an offspring with blue eyes, because they both have the alleles for blue eyes, and a blue eyed and indian will have a child with brown eyes, because the child only receive one allele for blue eyes, the other being an allele for brown eyes.

In the first instance the white male have passed down ”100 %” of his alleles coding for blue eyes, because the woman he mated with shard alleles for blue eyes, in other words ”indirect inheritance”. In the second example, the white male passes down ”50 %” of his blue eyed alleles.

Of course anyone with above average IQ understands this, otherwise. To understand just how absolutely absurd Razob Khan is, he is essentially saying he would be closer related to a sired offspring with a chimp then to another human being. Because the man/chimp-hybrid shares 50 % of his DNA. This is a ridiculous and stupid idea that needs no further consideration. By this point, it is self-evident that he is wrong.

>>509646547
It actually does. You are the retard here. No need to reply retard.

>>509646547
Do you ever see which way the wind is blowing and think to yourself "maybe if I continue pushing this propaganda, I'll eventually be hunted by Whites, just like jews hunted down former nazis and collaborators"?

Genuine question: if you're white and you had to race mix, would you rather go black or Asian?

>>509647959
offspring of a mixed pairing are closely related to their parents.
But offspring of a same race pairing are even more closely related.
Get it?

This debate notwithstanding, I believe that the solution to the world's problems is to selectively breed ourselves to be super intelligent and healthyby way of sperm donation, then give the sperm of these resulting super donors to every woman on earth so we can cure low intelligence and create a new global super race.
Seeking exclusive racial purity among the races will result in never-ending war and in all likelihood, a nuclear apocalypse.

>>509647161
>>509646169 (OP)
>>509646547
Still not racemixing Shlomo. Get in the oven.

>>509647293
My hapa looks like me. Maybe stop having weak genes, you nigger.

They don't track the data but from social media it seems like the majority of mixed children end up hating their White father even when he loves and provides for them.

>>509646547
And the fact that neither parent can donate bone marrow to their mutt kids is what? A coincidence?

>>509646547
>while they share virtually 0% with random strangers
This is like saying that a lego plane shares virtually 0% of it's brick components with a lego tank. It is not true. Replace bricks with alleles. White strangers are built of very similar alleles than yourself - something like fifth cousin. Basically, all White strangers you'll ever meet are some very distinct cousins of you on the genetic level.

>>509646547
What ever helps you cope mystery meat mutt subhuman.

>>509653465
lmao

>>509653976
Yeah, I feel so bad when 1pbtids laugh at me. I guess I'll go cry into the tight asian pussy I can have whenever I want. Enjoy your crippling loneliness.

Broadly Europeans are genetically similar enough to be 12th - 20th cousins.
The next nearest race to you wouldn't even be your 100th cousin removed, ergo you will be more closely related to your race than mixed-race offspring.
This becomes really important for organ donation.

Lol the next generation of leftists have come to /pol/ to get absolutely raped on racial science.

You know they have absolutely no idea about the percentages they throw around because humans are something like 90% "similiar" to chimps so this usage of percentage points to compare racialgroups is fucking massive and yet they'll throw out numbers like "0.1%" similiar etc thinking this talking point is somehow a win, it just shows how fucking retarded you are in reality.

OP fails yet again because he posted a picture showcasing the truth, mixed people born by whites are distanced in regard to genetic clusters ( he probably doesn't even know what this means ), this proves the pictures point.

It doesn't even stop there because we have insqne numbers showcasing just how different racial groups are with how many different alleles some groups have over others with staggering percentage numbers.
This isn't a game you will win once we break away from the peasantry numbers of "similiaries" and delve more into allele frequency percentages among groups.

>>509654178
This doesn't disprove your partner not being foreign-clustered genetically, posting weird incel ragebait isn't going to work here either.

>>509646169 (OP)
ah yes the side that cant define what a woman is, but also says a man can BE a woman through the power of belief alone, denies IQ (and its heritability) and says races are a social contsruct are the true understands of genetics and ancestry

>>509646169 (OP)
It's true tho

>>509646169 (OP)
So go have kids with a jet black gorilla nigger if race-mixing is so important to you

>>509646547
No one is saying why you are wrong. you share like 99.995% if your child and 99.990% with a white stranger and 99.975 with a random racial out-group.
The numbers here are not correct, but you get the picture.

>>509655558
If it was wrong then why are the offspring viable?

>>509655599
>everyone who disagrees with me is part of one big monolith!

>>509646169 (OP)
So I should adopt a white kid if I'm an incel?

>>509647112
Biracial and multiracial Americans are much more beautiful on average than monoracial Americans, that's just a fact. Like it or not, it's objectively true.

>>509646547
>Parents share approximately 50% of their DNA with their biological children, while they share virtually 0% with random strangers of any ethnicity.
Correct.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HclD2E_3rhI

>>509647161
That 0.1% is huge because it covers common gene associations and gene frequencies which have evolved together.

Did you know mixed race children are sicker, suffer from more mental illnesses. Mixed births also have a higher miscarriage rate.

>>509646169 (OP)
I've wondered why some people like (you) are retarded enough not to understand it.

>>509653465
your kid looks adopted, like pic related.

>>509646547
>Genetic relatedness is measured by actual shared DNA segments, not by broad ancestral categories.
Funny. Look into to organ matching for mixed race children. Spoiler: they don't get organ donor matches and die

>>509647104
So it would be ideal to reproduce with asians if white?
I knew it!

>>509647704
you have no idea who you are talking to, anon.

Twitter react thread!

>>509655856
yes.

>>509655788
Lol there's many people with genetic diseases and completely fucked for life people that are considered "offspring viable".

>>509655123
>This becomes really important for organ donation.

Exactly. When reality collides with ideology, reality wins.

>>509649500
If you lobe Japanese women beauty then you must not mix with them, since you are unable to recreate a Japanese women unless you are a Japanese man.

>>509646169 (OP)
OP used the word “retarded”
Should we report him to Woke Central Command?

>>509649193
>>509648843

>>509650839
>>509647692
I read a bunch of responses but I updoot these two.

>>509646169 (OP)
i think most people do. they'll see "muh bloodline" when if you go back even 3 generations, there are literally thousands of people that are your "bloodline", and all likely differing races too. there is no such thing as a "bloodline" unless you practice incest (and that makes your "bloodline" worse).

>>509656338

>>509656095
But I WON'T.
Figure that shit out.
Ain't raising some asshole or some whore's kid.

>>509647029
>Race mixing is beautiful and more and more people are doing it everyday

>>509656438
Outbreedings in many cases is worse than inbreeding.
A lot of the world marries their 1st and 2nd cousin. At least a billion, maybe 2 billion.

Almost no where in the world as stable outbreeding.

>>509647704
>why bother, you are just uninformed
>listen to the experts!
>>509648168
>i am the authority, i have a book!
>listen to the authority!
>>509648302
>its not ethical to use it for racism
says who?
>>509648711
>REEEE IM NOT MAD IM NOT MAD
>you are beneath me REEEE
>>509648782
>starts yidditspacing in its anger
>somehow thinks having a wife is bad?
>>509649190
>moves goalposts
>argues that since there is no purebreed, nothing matters
>"akshually its more important to"

>>509649084
>Being so retarded that he fails to understand the benefits of the carnivore diet

Trust the science, right?

Kek, what a bitch (KWAB)!

>>509656288
Its a sickening fetish to breed outside of your race.
Racemixing destroys both the races involved to create a mutant hybrid.

>>509649084
Do you believe in the holocaust?

>>509647029
>t.

>>509656175
>Breeding within a small population has never resulted in genetic diseases
Retard alert

>>509646547
literally braindead

>>509655964
Haha, not even close. Fitting that you'd post a picture of a 'cope'ala.

oh yeah if there are any 'race isn't real' people in this thread, here are the autonomy differences between races.

(note, the vast majority of racial differences are in the brain)

10 years ago an anon posted a data dump on race mixing showing how it wasn't good for genetics, of course I didn't save any of it because I figured someone else would.

>>509646547
>>509646169 (OP)
Your phenotype shows what you are.
If you're a white man, and you have a child with a black woman, your white neighbours' child will look more similar to you than your own child.

>>509655337
Sorry sweetie, but Race science fails to consider the SOCIAL CONTEXTS necessary to measure human intelligence and behavior.
Look up "Decontextualized Measurement", chud.

>>509658540
>hardware is different
>but its all about the programmer anyway
lol, lmao

>>509647161
>every italian looks like are from sicily

>>509656847
True
Latin America Is a shithole

>>509647161
Get a bone marrow transplant mutt

>>509658540
Let me guess
The social context only applies to the human brain. Human variability across groups, such as average skin color, eye color, height, lactose intollerance, gestation period, hair type, body hair, even penis size etc all have a genetic component. But the brain Is completely immune to Natural selection, you cant say anything about genes influencing IQ or human behavior ever because muh social context.

>>509660182
you sound upset, bigot
not my fault you are too dumb to understand

Don't race mix, anons. Your children will be thankful.

>>509646169 (OP)
Link to the original:

https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1940505760661684458

>>509646169 (OP)
>white coworker
>white neighbor
>white person on the street
not in this decade

>>509646547
>50% of their DNA
Um. Anon, I...

>>509647364
Imagine believing this.

>>509646169 (OP)
You say that but a mob of leftists would murder you for even knowing what that graph is

>>509660258
I understand It perfectly. Progressives will play the clown and obfuscate in order to avoid blaming niggers for their behavior, It must Always be whitey's fault. They will even pretend to be retards ("how do you even define human intelligence and behavior?") in order to deny the obvious.

>>509646169 (OP)
I just noticed:
If you reproduce with a sub-saran, you create a Somalian, and if you reproduce with a Jap, you create a Tatar.

>>509647310
That’s not true at all. Whites and East Asians are closely related. Haplogroup R1a and R1b are literally from an asiatic chink branch of haplogroups. Black African niggers are not closely related to anybody and neither are abos. Abos and niggers are the most unrelated groups on the planet

>>509646169 (OP)

You will be most genetically related to your child if you fuck your sister

>>509646547
That kind of proves it right though. Who wants most of their DNA segments to be from NIGGERS?

>>509662150

Shit eater

>>509662866

I know your dad is. But why bring that up?

>>509646169 (OP)
You got bullied out of the thread by facts proving you wrong. This was done by whites, ergo you are a Jew or possibly a nigger.
Come back and reveal the answer?

>>509646169 (OP)
Racists invented genetics and how ancestry works, you dunce.

>>509663149
It might be a young guy on his learning journey.
The jews know perfectly what /pol's opinion on the topic is.

>>509647029
the most Brazilian post ever, after tranny shit.
You are the capital of race mixing pardo

>>509659932
Mexicans are actually pretty inbred. They can't keep their hands off of their daughters and nieces and is a big problem in the US, same with blacks

>>509663430
I saw a family of Japs in the supermarket today
The mom and one of the daughters were brown, their ancestors got some brown dick in the past

>>509663068
Your whole worthless nation is,shit eater thats why you multiply and shit up every part of the world,like parasites you come en masse.Can't wait to cleanse you subhumans.

>>509646547
You can go on the wiki for fixation index right now and it proves the OP

>>509646547
Based

>>509646241
Lol retard

>>509647161
Educate yourself, retard.

>>509646547
>>509647195
hahah fuck sake man
you fucking reddit nigger

>>509647104
Cool chart, but people along the east African coast have been breeding with people from the middle east throughout that timeline. So it is incorrect

>>509646169 (OP)
>lmao I was only pretending that the truth is retarded

>>509646169 (OP)
but inbreeding causes genetic disease and the ultimate weakening of a bllodline. Most societies learned its best to let some outsiders in so the bloodline of the tribe doesnt become weak

>>509646547
a wrong nigger or jew you are, I reckon

>>509646241
So you have a child with a non white. The child is exactly half you. Has specific and uncontroversially identifiable traits that are exactly the same as yours. Has many of your mannerism.

And then some white lady with white kids from a meth head comes along, and you cuck for them at the expense of your kids because “muh heritage”. Is that what you’re saying?

>>509646169 (OP)
What people do not understand is that for most men finding an asian woman who does not fuck with your brain is easier than finding same trad white woman.
It is not about children and genes, it is about living with a person who cares about you.

>>509646547
>smartest mutt

>>509646169 (OP)
>>509646547
kek shit bait but you got replies

>>509646547
Based

>>509647161
Im sorry do we share 99.8% or not? So what a random white is 99.9% the same as me what the fuck would that make my son? 99.99? we just adding more decimal points where is that 50% gonna go if we already have a 99.8% similarity with every other human on the planet.
You are the dumbest blackest retard gorilla I've ever met.

>>509664647
>>509665484
at least change IP before samefagging and calling yourself based, dumbass mutt

>>509665034
This is the whole reason for sexual reproduction in the first place. Why sexually reproduce at all? Sexual reproduction introduces a cost as it forces individuals to invest resources in competing for mates rather than allowing them to dump all their resources into their cloned offspring. There has to be a benefit. The benefit is increased adaptability: you introduce a bit of non-self DNA into your own which may boost the survivability of the portion of DNA into your offspring that is yours. It’s a trade off, because no individual can survive well in all contexts.

The question is whether it’s possible to introduce too much noise into your DNA if you seek mates far outside your geographic area. And the answer is likely yes. I would bet that African + Eurasian DNA can have some issues. However, given how broad and quick the connections are between stretches of Eurasia, intermixing between Eurasian groups likely yields positive adaptability. It’s all speculation though.

>>509647704
>and stuff

>>509646169 (OP)
I only care about white people, specifically fit, healthy and productive whites who don't hate their race or history. All other groups can go fuck themselves, especially kikes.
Jim Crow and Nuremberg Laws are just the beginning of what has to be reintroduced into modern society.

>>509665724
I know, can you believe that nigger ?

if you have a common ancestor then yes, you literally share the same DNA, you fucking retards

>>509646547
>posts lewontin's fallacy
you wrong, boyo. we share dna with every living thing on the planet. any person will have more snps in common with a person in their own cluster than their own child if the wife is of a different ethnicity.
e.g., a person with italian ancestry would be able to match for hla more frequently with any other random italian than their own offspring, if that offspring is a result of a mixed ancestry union. this is basic genetics.

>>509666547

>>509666547
>>509666804

>>509646547
You are incorrect. This is called Lewontin's fallacy which has been taught as fact across academia and pop science since the 70s with glee by people who believe it disproves "racism", but modern genetics prove it was totally wrong.

>Parents share approximately 50% of their DNA with their biological children
This is technically not true. A parent passes on 50% of their DNA, but they share over 99.9%, since 99.9% of the DNA of the other parent is the same as their own and passed to their child also.

White people and black people share about 99.9% of their DNA. The remaining 0.1% determines skin color, afro or straight hair, lactose tolerance et cetera.. These 0.1% are the genes we are talking about when we look at genetic distance.

>0.1% sounds small!
We share around 99% of our DNA with Chimpanzees and most of these genes influence things like cellular biochemistry, not traits that differentiate between people. Note it only takes 1 gene to give someone cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anaemia, one single gene can change someone's life. Do I really have to explain something so basic?

We see this represented on these genetic distance maps, which are multifocal and far more accurate than the cherry picked one Lewontin used in the 1970s long before we had sequenced the human genome. We can see that population groups largely separate for 10000s of years share clusters of genes, as you would expect. Likewise other groups have a different cluster of genes. When you compare these clusters, a German has far more in common with an Englishman than someone half-black half-white.

OP pic says specifically
>more genetically related
This is not incorrect, 99.99% is closer to 100% than 99.95%, is it not?

>>509647029
its just a lobotomy but without any of the perks

>>509646169 (OP)
>>509646547
The guy is too ignorant to be talking about genes and haplogroups but his heart is in the right place. All we care about is that our children are white and don't have some hideous goblin/ogre phenotype. That's often why some foolishly pair with Asians because they've been deluded by the few random decent-looking anecdotes, that they've come across in life.

>>509646169 (OP)
look at the graph stupid midwit

>>509655759
You probably also share 89% of your DNA with bacteria

>>509647959
doesn't matter retard. the other 50% are so distant that it makes a stranger more related. the fact that you don't understand this is proof of your stupidity.

>>509647355
Whiter than you Muhammad

>>509647692
PCA charts are relative measurements that are calibrated specifically for the sake of making a certain plot.
They are not objective measurements. You can make a PCA chart that has different lineages of Labrador dogs stretch farther than humans.
You should learn more about this topic.

>>509648485
Isn't there one of a white woman with a mulatto child with a face of agony/regret holding it whilst it pulls an ugly and aggressive face

I'd argue the left is more guilty of that. After all, they are the ones who say, "We are all the same." Are we though? And if we are the same and race doesn't exist, why do they talk about "white privilege" and "reparations?" If my experience, race only exists when it's bad for white people. When it's good for white people, it suddenly does not exist again.

African American are on average 24% European. This is one reason they have bad health.

Imagine having a child who doesn't look anything like you. Must be terrible knowing this alien creature came out of your body.

>>509648239
Ironically it’s the jews on this board that have pushed the white supremacy rhetoric so much that every midwit faggot on here falls for it. This thread is one example, and you’re either a jew yourself or a complete fucking retard.

>>509668199
>>509647293
>>509647692
>>509665550
Let me break it down since you guys don't understand basic math. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a random person of race to have more shared DNA than your own child. You fags always reduce dna to skin hair, eye, color when in fact human dna is extremely more complex than just phenotype markers.

Two different measurements:
1. Species-level similarity (comparing DNA sequences):

Any two humans: ~99.9% identical DNA sequences

Humans vs chimpanzees: ~99% identical DNA sequences

Humans vs bananas: ~50% identical DNA sequences

2. Inheritance-based relatedness (comparing which specific DNA segments you inherited):

Your biological child: ~50% of their DNA came directly from you

Your full sibling: ~50% of your DNA came from the same sources (same parents)Random human of same ancestry: ~0.1-0.5% of DNA segments trace to recent shared ancestors

Random human of different ancestry: ~0% DNA segments from recent shared ancestors

>>509665265
You have to measure our absolute worst against your absolute best in order to make a point.

>>509669852
It’s just a plot of the linear combinations along with the greatest variance is explained. These 2D plots are just the two most informative axes

>>509671650
Replace meth head with whatever you like: billionaire body building professor of math at Harvard. You’ll cuck for his kids over your actual own children with a non-white just because he’s white?

What makes you drawn to your kids is not that they belong to your race—it’s that they are literally half you. And presumably you chose your partner (white or not) for the genes that may intermingle with your own.

>>509671634
Bottom line: a simple genetic test can tell you with 99.9999% certainty if someone is your child, regardless of what race the mother is. For the paternity test to be so accurate, it must be based on something. That “something” is exactly why you favor your own children over a stranger’s, regardless of anyone’s race.

You love your kids because YOU are in your kids—not because they are the same race as you.

>>509646547
>while they share virtually 0% with random strangers
Correct. But your children are still more closely related to a random white stranger than they are to some ethnic animal

>>509646547
Why are the biological parents of mixed race people genetically incompatible for bone marrow transplants? They literally have to rely on finding a random mixed race person hundreds of miles away for the procedure.

>>509671634
A white spouse shares the same dna as you, for all intents and purposes, a white spouse is a clone of you, so the offspring will be a clone.
A mate of a different race introduces a large amount of exotic dna that you don't have, resulting in a hybrid child that is related to you, but less related to you than a random white kid, because the dna of people of the same race is extremely similar.

>>509646547
THIS IS COPY PASTED FROM CHATGPT YOU CAN STOP REPLYING NOW

>>509646547
Now that's what I call pilpul

>>509646169 (OP)
He's correct. There is little racial connection between you and your child with another people and an equal distance between them and the other racial group, too. It's why "half breeds" historically are dislocated and lonely feeling people. There are entire epics written about it. And, it's reoccurring theme in fantasy stories, too.

>>509647161
>>509646547
You don't understand how DNA and genes work kike. If you racially mix, a stranger of your own ethnicity WOULD be more genetically similar to you then your own child.

>right wingers are retarded

leftists are retarded and deny the existence of genetics when it comes to humans at all.

>>509646547
>actually had to resort to an AI to produce a reply for the genetic closeness question
>and the AI produced a reddit

not seeing the difference between races is the flat-earthism of liberals

>>509648575
>only non-Jewish Whites donate bone marrow
>It's also non-Jewish Whites' fault that other races don't donate bone marrow

>>509660182
ummm, yeah sweety
the brain is in your skull, where it is insulated from evolutionary pressures

>>509669852
Okay, then let's solve the statistical and graphical problems inherent to PCA charts by representing the data using vectors in a Hilbert space. That way we can directly compare the Euclidean distances between different data clusters without resorting to imprecise data-analysis techniques.

>>509646169 (OP)
Okay, here's the final say on this.
>a white person can donate an organ to another white person most easily
>a white person can never donate an organ to their mixed-race children
End of.

>>509646547
dumbest post of the year award

>>509647310
>This isn't even correct, Africans are closer genetically to Whites than Asians
Europeans/whites are literally a distant branch of Asians who came from China tens of thousands of years ago, through the Pontic steppes

>>509646241
Fpbp

In one side there are 5 cups of 50% lemon, mixed with some other elements like water. On the other side there are 5 cups of 50% apply juice, mixed with some other elements like water.

One cup from one side is mixed with one cup from the other side, but so as to not overflow, all the contents are halved. So each give 50%, making the lemon and apple juice content in the new mix 25%.

If the cups mix with the cups in their own side, the contents stay the same, 50% lemon, or 50% apple juice no matter how much they mix. Now move the 25% lemon and 25% apple juice cup into either side and ask yourself if it stands out.

>>509676134
>Europeans/whites are literally a distant branch of Asians who came from China tens of thousands of years ago, through the Pontic steppes
Dis ain't make no sense.
If Europeans are the most diverse (eye color, hair color, height, etc), then it means we were the OG human(oid) specie on the planet, and the NE Asians must've went through a genetic bottleneck, because they all look the same.

>>509661139
They won't do shit

>>509676418
And also, on the way, they must've bred with some animalistic specie, since they're barely human.
They have the IQ, but no emotions or creativity. True bugmen.

Ok anons I want to give you a thought experiment. Lets say all that racial anthropology was correct. Whites at top, blacks aren't humans, etc.

Why are blacks even free right now? Why aren't they in plantations or being eaten? Why can't you convince anyone in the real world your right?

I'm trying to wrap my head around it and don't believe a few million jews have enough power to hold down hundreds of millions of white people. There must be an explanation. If you are right why can't you convince your government and prove it to them that those black niggers aren't humans and they should all be dead for our safety?