why is one rich and technologically advanced and other is still third-world poor and dirty - they started from the same level and the same population 40 years ago
>>509662062 (OP)One of them isn't full of jeets
>>509662062 (OP)State-sanctioned slavery and stealing tech. Decades later, China's in decline because it bit the same western hands that feed them while India is catching up despite their slow retarded steps forward.
India is too much fragmented culturally and socially. China was a thing before PCC, India not.
>>509662062 (OP)the Chinese are genetically much smarter than the Indians and they aren't tied down by religion (especially the retarded caste system) or democracy. An authoritarian govt can be very efficient if it's led by competent people
>>509662062 (OP)Both of your assessments are false. China is as third world and poor as they come. Being better than out situation won't change that fact
>>509662062 (OP)One built a bridge for cars with 90 degree turn
>>509662062 (OP)India still had a higher GDP PPP per capita than China in 1993. In 2023, China's was 142% higher than India's
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD?locations=CN-IN
>>509662062 (OP)One poos in the loo the other designates streets
Why are people even comparing the two.
Completely different countries, completely different histories, completely different cultures.
It's like posting a picture of India and the US and asking the same question.
Does that make sense to you? It doesn't right, so why would you do it.
It'd be more apt to compare and contrast India with the USA or India with EU, since they're all Yamnaya rape babies.
>>509664651they are both in asia and in 80s-90s had almost the same population and gdp, but one did something right and/or other did did something wrong
european countries like italy and germany are also different culturally but no one has any problem with comparing them economically