older anons, what's your opinion on Occupy Wall Street? what did people here think about it at the time?

An incoherent nuisance which accomplished almost nothing.

>>509672611 (OP)
4chan supported it, pretty much everyone did at that time. Jews subverted it as usual.

>>509672611 (OP)
I thought it was a faggot movement and I was right, it was later co-opted by the left and became the present day woke/feminism/tranny bullshit.

There was cooler more important shit going on like Anonymous vs SOPA/PIPA. I remember Anonymous, which I had no involvement in nor affiliate with, DDOS attacked Harry Reids office and harrassed him along with others officials. Pretty sure that was a big part of why the bill never passed. Remember Ajit Paul? Harry Reid was his predecessor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA

>>509672611 (OP)
jews used redirection
it was super effective

>>509674476
identity politics really poisoned the well

>>509674350
I remember that too, but Occupy Wall Street still seems more significant desu

>>509672611 (OP)
I was excited about it at the beginning and even went to an occupy demonstration in my city. It became incoherent, like everyone involved had different goals. Overall I think it turned me off from political action. I haven't attended a protest since then

first time you really knew leftist movements would never amount to anything in the US killing themself with their "progressive stack" and such bullshit.
Everyone besides the kikes and their cronies wanted the banking shit to stop but 90% turned away in disgust on seeing
>muh disabled translesbian black jews must speak first!

>>509674476
This

>>509672611 (OP)
> what did people here think about it at the time?

It was retarded gay liberal BS. But it turned out the faggyness of the left in 2011 was only .000000000001% of their true potential.

>>509672611 (OP)
It was the start of the clown world.
The elite didn't like having people revolt against them.

>>509672611 (OP)
>older anons, what's your opinion on Occupy Wall Street?
It was a bunch of retards marching around the most overregulated city on earth making the earnest case that the problem with society is too much banks

>>509672611 (OP)
It was based until the (((bankers))) rolled out more divisive politics. I still can't believe people didn't want heads to roll for the 08 crisis. They got billions of dollars instead of being thrown in jail. I fucking hate boomers

>>509676281
>the problem with society is too much banks

They were right, they just didn't point out the ethnicities of those running the banks.

>>509676593
> I still can't believe people didn't want heads to roll for the 08 crisis

They did, what do you think the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street were? They channeled the rage of the people screwed over by the 2008 crisis/bailout. But they were never going to go anywhere since all the energy was diverted back into the Red vs Blue pre-established system where the elite never face any accountability or consequences.

The banks needed to go bankrupt

It would have been the birth of anarchy

Sieg Heil!

>>509672611 (OP)
Anything that doesn't actively agitate the jewish menace at hand will prove counterproductive in the long run

>>509674747
>Occupy Wall Street still seems more significant
All due respect to the pre-tranny protesters, the classical liberals, but they didn't get shit done. Harassing government officials and attacking their servers domestic-terrorist style did.

Finance gurus advised hiring the organizers into the system. Enguise of helping fix the system. Absorbed, assimilated, problem gone, welcome to the machine.

>>509672611 (OP)
Anons made fun of them then. Now life is worse for everyone in the low/middle class lol.
>>509675326
Thats the urban elite trying to steer away from the lefts original message. Fracturing causes are their way of sabotaging the movement. These are people that push this shit on the left but then they'l go and vote conservative in secrecy.

It got sabotaged by jewish faggots, literally