Meta thread - /pol/ (#509678362) [Archived: 612 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: Z5gMZ/6BAustralia
7/6/2025, 9:16:09 PM No.509678362
f9bd04f7d74a58f388254356015f1797
f9bd04f7d74a58f388254356015f1797
md5: 5f40de5329fb28099c79f55f4d18f5ce🔍
We should have bans for people who post off topic women on pol, because they're just using sex as a way to bait replies contributing to a lower level of discussion centred around sex and insecurity over sex.
Replies: >>509678938 >>509679129
Anonymous ID: oxVPIAHBUnited Kingdom
7/6/2025, 9:24:23 PM No.509678938
>>509678362 (OP)
100% this. Need an /inc/ or /sex/ board badly.
Anybody who promotes low quality bait shit is efffectively a bot poisoning the well.
Anonymous ID: f2754qxVUnited States
7/6/2025, 9:26:49 PM No.509679129
patrol
patrol
md5: 7d0af4bf5d32f75a908439ca80276f4b🔍
>>509678362 (OP)
>We should have bans
newsflash
jannies dont do anything until multiple reports
stop whining
start whacking
pro tips -
focus on catalog threads
porn is the easiest target
next is trolling outside /b/
Anonymous ID: Z5gMZ/6BAustralia
7/6/2025, 9:34:02 PM No.509679624
1746850894125w
1746850894125w
md5: 6d88a9abb6056db18adfb8e406c99793🔍
I suggest we implement an AI censor that replaces all images of scantily clad or suggestive women with Felix the cat