Discuss.

That's basically it. There is nothing to discuss except for the retards on Xitter who need @grok telling them what to think.

>>509685302

>Discuss.
you're a literal imbecile with a cool ID

>>509685771
On 4chan’s /pol/, where the culture thrives on anonymity, provocation, and sharp banter, responding to a reply like “>Discuss. you're a literal imbecile with a cool ID” requires a mix of wit, restraint, and understanding the board’s vibe. The user’s comment is a classic low-effort jab—insulting while vaguely acknowledging your post’s ID (a random string often memed on 4chan). Your goal is to either engage, deflect, or ignore, depending on what you want out of the interaction. Here’s how you could approach it:

>>509685137 (OP)
Correct, AI trannies can't deny this

>>509686352
Ignore and Move On: If the reply adds nothing to your thread, let it slide. /pol/ threads move fast, and feeding trolls can derail your discussion. Most anons will skim past low-effort bait like this.
Play the Game with Wit: If you want to engage, match their tone without getting butthurt. For example:“>calling me an imbecile
Sick burn, anon, but my ID’s cooler than your whole post history. Discuss.”
This keeps it light, flips the insult, and leans into the “cool ID” remark to stay on-brand with /pol/’s ironic humor.

Deflect and Refocus: If your thread is serious and you want to keep it on track, acknowledge the jab but pivot back to your topic:“>imbecile
Cool story, anon. Anyway, [restate your thread’s main point or question].”
This shows you’re not rattled and keeps the thread’s momentum.

>>509685137 (OP)
they are better than what search engines have become there are stories the Western media doesn't report on at all for certain (((reasons))) that they can find

>>509685137 (OP)
No! AI can do m-dashes like New York Times journalists.

>>509686432
Savage Clapback (Risky): If you’re feeling spicy and want to lean into /pol/’s chaotic energy, you could go for a sharper retort:“>imbecile
Bold words from a guy whose best contribution is greentexting my ID. Step up or lurk moar.”
Be warned: this might invite more trolling, so only do it if you’re ready for the thread to spiral.

Key Tips:Stay anonymous in tone; don’t take insults personally—/pol/ thrives on edgy banter.
Avoid sounding defensive or overly invested; it’s a green flag for more trolling.
If the thread’s worth saving, focus on anons who engage with your actual point.
If it’s just noise, let the thread die and start a new one later.

What’s the context of your thread? That’d help me tailor a more specific response strategy.

>>509685137 (OP)
True for ChatGPT 3 and earlier.
4 and onwards can reason.

I agree, for the very first time ever, I agree with a leaf.
Pshh, the end times are near it seems.

>>509686432
>>509686473
nice AI posts

>>509685137 (OP)
AI is propping the stock markets. The amounts of money being poured into this are mind boggling.

>>509685137 (OP)
Ford CEO said AI will take most white collar jobs in 5 years (two more weeks).
Discuss!

>>509686618

>>509686352
>>509686432
>>509686473
now tell grok the whole story, you stupid monkey
lets watch you get cucked by an overhyped search engine in real time