Anonymous
ID: A7i/16DM
7/7/2025, 12:56:31 AM No.509694152
Why isn't this talked about more? This conference, along with the Hart-Celler act of 1965, sealed the deal on the destruction of america, and the west as a whole.
There was a (((conference))) in 1944 called the Bretton Woods Conference. This led to the establishment of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Also at this conference (((global bankers))) decided that a country's worth would be based on national GDP instead of individual GPD (personal net worth/living standards), which is the dumbest metric to use. For example, India has a high national GDP, but the lowest individual GDP per person in the world. The same with China.
So, every western country since this point has been trying to increase their GDP at the expense of individual GDP. In fact, there is an inverse relationship between increasing national GDP and quality of life in the west. The GDP of America today is significantly higher than it was in the 50's, but living standards have plummeted.
Western governments are just printing money and flooding their countries with people who they know who will live of of welfare but if it moves the national GDP number up even a point they are happy.
We don't need a single immigrant in the west. A low birth rate is eugenic. AI and automation are about to replace most jobs anyway. But western economies are so entrenched in this system that they have to feed into it or it will collapse like any other Ponzi scheme.
Switching a country's worth metric back to individual GDP should be the goal! Then governments would be forced to care about their population. Their performance is tied to increasing living standards. This is something the right and left should be able to find common ground on.
There was a (((conference))) in 1944 called the Bretton Woods Conference. This led to the establishment of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Also at this conference (((global bankers))) decided that a country's worth would be based on national GDP instead of individual GPD (personal net worth/living standards), which is the dumbest metric to use. For example, India has a high national GDP, but the lowest individual GDP per person in the world. The same with China.
So, every western country since this point has been trying to increase their GDP at the expense of individual GDP. In fact, there is an inverse relationship between increasing national GDP and quality of life in the west. The GDP of America today is significantly higher than it was in the 50's, but living standards have plummeted.
Western governments are just printing money and flooding their countries with people who they know who will live of of welfare but if it moves the national GDP number up even a point they are happy.
We don't need a single immigrant in the west. A low birth rate is eugenic. AI and automation are about to replace most jobs anyway. But western economies are so entrenched in this system that they have to feed into it or it will collapse like any other Ponzi scheme.
Switching a country's worth metric back to individual GDP should be the goal! Then governments would be forced to care about their population. Their performance is tied to increasing living standards. This is something the right and left should be able to find common ground on.
Replies:
