>>509695065 (OP)Livestock have tangible value. With women it's virtualized as porn or rentable adventures. Or like men, they are corporate serfs with peer selected consumer tastes. They're not worth eating or wearing in a suit of clothes and neither do their bodily fluids nourish without supplemental fortification in raw form. So I's say you're merely expressing inapt angst. Of course the photo suggests White women, but your agenda needs no introduction beyond calling you a faggot shitskin. Anyway, your thread sucks as usual