>The essential characteristic of a license is that it is revocable at
>the will of the possessor of the land, subject only to the licensee’s
>right to be on the land for a reasonable time after revocation for
>the purpose of removing his goods thereon. Even though the
>revocation of a license may be a breach of contract and give rise to
>an action for damages, it is effective to deprive the licensee of all
>justification for entering or remaining on the land except as
>provided above.

https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017

>In fact, the same treatise suggests that at least some copyright
>licenses need not satisfy all the requirements of contract formation:
>“Notwithstanding that feature of state law, no consideration is
>necessary under federal law to effectuate a transfer of copyright
>ownership that does not purport to require consideration.”127 But the
>cases cited for this proposition relate only to revocability of licenses,
>where some cases hold that the absence of consideration makes a
>license revocable.128 Those cases are consistent with the view that a
>license, to be enforceable, must be a contract. Revoking a license is
>the licensor’s act of ceasing to comply with its previous promise not to
>sue for infringement, and if that previous promise was not
>contractually enforceable because of the absence of consideration,
>then there would be no obstacle to revocation. That is, these cases
>can be interpreted to mean that revocation is permissible where the
>license is noncontractual.
https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017

The GPL can be revoked from free takers, even if it's "version 3".
(Note: usually "The GPL" means version 2: which is the most used version before linux adopted feminism in 2007-2009, and rejected Grsecurity because Linus bent the knee to the NSA's national security letters)

mikey the pedophile thread

>>509706683
Why do you want the GPL not to be revocable?
Do you not respect yourself as a copyright holder?
As a builder of things? As an artist?

>NOO, I __MUST___ have NO rights against my provocateurs!
>GET AWAY FROM ME US LAW: YOU CANNOT GIVE ME RIGHTS TO MY _PROPERTY_!! NOOOOOOO!

Do you like property tax too?
You built the code: why do you think you cannot control it?

The GPL should be revoked from CoC suckers and Rust-encrusters.

C projeckts were never ment to be trans'd (read: castrated and dick chopped).
They were ment to be ...free... software: free to do whatever they wish with memory.
Under the watchful eye of the kernel (ex: grsecurity).

mikeeusa go to jail already you stupid pedophile
children are children stop trying to marry them sick fuck
islam is right about you jews

>>509706313 (OP)
Retard, this is /pol/ not /g/, mikecuck

>>509707261
>islam is right about you jews
Bet you're a koran-only muslim
And ignore the Ashia-loli loving hadiths (Sahih Bukari volume 5)

Also note how you change the subject since you have no refutation.

>>509707392
We're all the same 12-13 people on the same node. Nice "vpn".

>VAX48

>>509707452
>vpn
I'm brown doe

>>509707580
I'm browner, as you can see
<------------------

Brown as a frozen midnight in january.
Beat that.

>>509707704
Why do you love doxing yourself Mike? Are you that mentally ill?

>>509706313 (OP)
Your link is dead, fren