>>509726246>I'm a national socialist, can you please debunk national socialism for me?Not sure what you mean by "debunk". I don't think it's an ineffective system, I just don't think it's the most optimal either, and I think it has the negative long term effect of stifling human creativity. For example, I would rather live in 1950s-1990s USA than I would in 1930-1940s Germany.
I think using slave labor is wrong. I think a lot of the music and movies produced in Germany during the 30s and 40s were boring. I much prefer a society that allows free expression and the development of new art forms. I think that artistic expression is arguably the highest form of human expression, right up there with technological development. I wouldn't want to live in a society with high technology if it didn't also have interesting cultural output as well.
Like, the Nazis invented Television in the mid 1930s. They basically had TV 20 years before the USA did...but did they do anything interesting with it? Not really, they broadcasted sports competitions and the occasional film or theatrical performance.
This is the same reason why I think communism is gay and shitty. Did communists in Soviet Russia develop any form of art that was remotely as interesting as rock n' roll in the USA? No, they didn't. All of their art was shitty top-down stuff which was dictated by elderly party leaders. It wasn't vibrant.
Maybe if Germany had fully won the war they would've moderated a lot of their more extreme views and would have embraced greater degrees of freedom which could have led to more interesting artistic and cultural developments, but I doubt it.
It's the same issue with modern China today. Whether you call them communist or you think they are actually practicing a form of national socialism, the end result is still the same. They are great at manufacturing and have high technology, but culturally they are just boring. There's no cool Chinese art, music, or movies