This is not about relationships anymore. It is about survival in a collapsing order. Even if one finds a so-called pure partner, what future are they raising their family into? Schools, media, government, everything is hostile to life, heritage, and meaning. Fertility is down not because of women’s choices alone but because the culture made meaning itself obsolete. Pretending virginity will save the West is like rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship. There is no rescue coming. The choice now is between building a fragile pocket of sanity in the ruins or watching passively as everything burns.“No hymen no diamond” was never a solution, just another desperate attempt to draw moral lines in a culture that erased them long ago. It is meaningless posturing in a world where purity is commodified and sold before most people even understand what they have lost. Talking about “white genocide” in this context is delusional. Demographics are not collapsing because men cannot find virgins. They are collapsing because the entire system is built to atomize and consume people before they can build anything lasting. There is no army of tradwives waiting to rebuild civilization, only a dying market of disillusioned individuals clinging to fantasies while the machine keeps accelerating.

This is not about relationships anymore. It is about survival in a collapsing order. Even if one finds a so-called pure partner, what future are they raising their family into? Schools, media, government, everything is hostile to life, heritage, and meaning. Fertility is down not because of women’s choices alone but because the culture made meaning itself obsolete. Pretending virginity will save the West is like rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship. There is no rescue coming. The choice now is between building a fragile pocket of sanity in the ruins or watching passively as everything burns.

>>509728789 (OP)
Why passively? Be a problem; be part of the solution

>>509728789 (OP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
Calhoun mice experiment explains many things
>inviting migrants
>increasing autism and NEET behaviuor
>drop in fertility rates and even copulations frequency
>death of societal spirit leading to total die off of colony
now we are people, so it's not 1:1, but we have jews also

>>509728789 (OP)
I want the collapse. in comparison to what we have today, total societal breakdown sounds comfy. hopefully I won't die too painfully. I'll be drunk for most of it anyway.

>>509730562
plus decreasing agression in males and urge to protect own teritory (grass eating males anyone?), while females get more agressive while less attached to offspring (abortions anyone?)
>>>509727531

>>509728789 (OP)
The question of virginity was never supposed to be literally about virginity itself. It's shorthand for "did she have onr or two past long-term lovers, or is she hoeing out every weekend?". It's what makes the difference between "woman you can build a life with" and "horrific mistake that took years of my life away and drove me to drink". But this board has been flooded with retards and /r9k/ faggots who cannot distinguish a difference, nor attempt a realistic compromise in earnest. They'd rather autistically flail and do nothing because that's what's easiest. Crabs in a bucket. Half of 'em are nogs anyway, so don't be too mad at them. It's just their nature.

>>509728789 (OP)
>"No hymen no diamond” was never a solution
Nice try retard but I'm not marrying a whore

>>509728789 (OP)
Only genetically engineered domestic foxgirls can solve this problem.

>>509732421
Dumb take. All families had rights to kill a man who took the virginity of a daughter, unless he claimed the woman to himself. Virginity is the hallmark of the pure and chaste, and its only natural that men seek this. If you are a father and you are helping and aiding your daughter to lose your virginity outside marriage, you are aiding societal collapse.

Your point only really makes sense in an 80-90s argument, when people still kinda worked out chastity halfway, in that teens were not supposed to have ONS and often married with sub-3 partners. Marrying a woman who had a bad boyfriend experience and a failed teen one is bad but not two-digit partner sample size bad. Now let me ask you this: why would you fight for 90s relationship dynamics when you can fail and stay the same way we are, when fighting for virginity at marriage can fail to 90s partnership (still a win)?

>>509728789 (OP)

>>509733973
Kill yourself JustPassingThrough.
KILL YOUR FUCKING SELF.

>>509730562
I seen that video before YouTube banned it, it makes some interesting parallels that are looking quite obvious in human societies

>>509733973

>>509730797
>runs out of booze
what now nigger not so comfy anymore

The West is directly to blame

The chances of either human maintaining marriage for 15 years or longer if they had 10+ partners beforehand Is around 10%.

I call it the 10 for 10 rule. What's interesting is that it continues to scale, but of course never scales to 0%.

>>509728789 (OP)
This thread is made in an effort to convince those intelligent enough to theorize about its contents to not have children.
israeli-paid jeet kys