Wait, adultery is legal in America? Wtf

Unironically good

>>509740126 (OP)
This would solve so much bullshit

it already is in many states

>§ 14-184. Fornication and adultery.
If any man and woman, not being married to each other, shall lewdly and lasciviously associate, bed and cohabit together, they shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor

>§ 14‑186. Opposite sexes occupying same bedroom at hotel for immoral purposes; falsely
registering as husband and wife.
Any man and woman found occupying the same bedroom in any hotel, public inn or
boardinghouse for any immoral purpose, or any man and woman falsely registering as, or
otherwise representing themselves to be, husband and wife in any hotel, public inn or
boardinghouse, shall be deemed guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.

Adultery should be punishable by slow, torturous death (both cheaters involved). Anything else is unacceptable.

It's based if it's only for women. Men should be allowed to cheat though.

>>509741834
Explain your reasoning?

>>509741905
Because women will just withhold pussy until their husbands seek it elsewhere as a tactic to "win" when they inevitably files for divorce.

>>509741905
because men are based and straight and white, while womoids are cringe and gay niggers
TOTAL WOMOID DEATH

Paternal DNA tests should also be mandatory at birth.

>>509740126 (OP)
they made it not a crime anymore some time ago.
it should be a crime though, death penalty if they can prove there was no coercion

>>509742536
This right here. This would solve many issues.

>>509741534
Those laws are never enforced and if they were they’re be found unconstitutional

>>509742536
Imagine that

>>509740126 (OP)

>arrested for violating a civil contract

lmao no you won't

>>509742148
Which is why we need to legalize marital "rape" again.

>>509740126 (OP)
Nah....Americans will never be that based. Has to be fake.

>>509741647
It should be a civil penalty. Trying to criminalize sexual immorality is puritanical autism if both parties are consenting, but it's within the state's remit to try and enforce marital fidelity given that it's a civil contract

>>509742536
This

>>509744248
Eh, I agree with
>>509744901
Throwing people in jail for violating a contract (assuming there's not other factors, like bodily harm or property damage) seems too broad. Then an argument will be made for jail time for ANY contract, like a missing/late credit card payment. Regardless, a law like that would never stand up long-term in court regardless of the court leaning.

>>509740126 (OP)
BASED
No Fault Divorce should be eliminated.

>>509740126 (OP)
This is probably fake TikTok bullshit, but it would be the only based thing Trump has ever done

>>509740126 (OP)
Sounds like iran

still might be a nothingburger, sometimes people these days just have a ceremony but dont actually sign any papers to get legally married
so they can just split up and not have to go through mountains of bullshit and piss away thousands of dollars
i bet the majority of zoomer couples are going to end up doing this rendering the law basically useless

>>509743006
Only if her pockets are deep enough to take it to the SCOTUS.

>>509740126 (OP)
No, but in some states you can be sued for "alienation of affection" for breaking up a marriage through infidelity.

Good luck finding a court that will side with a man over a woman

>>509741905
"Men are just sexual creatures" aka
>I can't take accountability for anything (like a woman) and I have no self control

>no link
>no law cited
kek

>>509740126 (OP)
Gynocracy banned polygamous marriages

>>509745559
if this happens then the law will be changed so having a marriage ceremony means you are legally married. many states already have common law marriages. some states even have laws that are not common law marriages but you are essentially married if you live togeather

>>509741534
Look up sodomy in the UCMJ.

>>509742536
Bongs are fucked, but France having paternity tests made illegal is fucked immensely as well in a different direction.

>>509740126 (OP)
>Wait, adultery is legal in America? Wtf
Good.
It's about time.
Women's rights should be repealed next.

>>509741905
/pol/ is full of spiritual negroes.
>>509745606
This

>>509740833
Do you know who are some of the biggest benefiters of abortion? Married women. Take a guess why that is and who the fathers are (hint: not the husband).

>>509741834
She should be able to prosecute the other woman for adultery though.

>>509748314
>She should be able to prosecute the other woman for adultery though.
She can. The legal term is call Alienation of Affection.

>>509740126 (OP)
Violating a contract is a civil issue, and people usually sue each other as part of the divorce

>>509742216
This but unironically