>>509765731>it's about G7 VS BRICSIt's not about that because the majority of BRICS agrees with preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon because setting off a nuclear arms race in the Middle East would be geopolitically catastrophic for the interests of every major player even remotely interested in the region, which is why Putin has stated many the same thing many times, as has Xi. Non proliferation isn't a specific to the US.
The reasons for that are pretty obvious and shouldn't need to be spelled out. It's not in the interest of larger countries for smaller ones to obtain an item that gives them an upper hand and levels the playing field somewhat. That applies to Turkey too, who are a big player themselves.
Turkey was the reason that Assad's government fell a few months ago (a disaster for Iran's ambitions). They have their own ambitions in the region that don't line up with Iran.
Tucker doesn't even bother to go into any of this stuff because he's not dealing in facts but propaganda. He's trying to paint an image of world affairs where Iran is on the side of light like a scorned anime hero and his own country, the US, which he enjoys a luxurious life in, is on the side of dark.
>Looking at America it's obvious we've lost the means to control the world with coercion and threats, having decayed to much and being overleveraged physically and fiscally.There's some truth in that, largely because the US has had a series of ineffective Presidents and also because the US, like the Western world at large, has failed to maintain its military budget after the end of the cold war. This, combined with demoralization in society, has made the US try to rely on things like economic warfare exclusively, which has started to become overused. Sanctions work if you make them hit the opponent like a sledgehammer. They don't work if you apply them mildly, allowing your opponent to work around the sanctions. which is what has happened with Russia
