>>509780722>Why is it that analog computers are what can lead to AI?No, no analog computers will lead to viable bipedal robotics. I might have been to vague in my previous posts.
>Is it because they are much more efficient, or some other reason?sensors give robots analog signals. ADCs convert analog to digital, the conversion introduces latency. which makes realistic bipedal movement totally unachievable.
AGI cannot exist because you cannot program free will. Free will or rather agency is required for AGI. Basically AGI would need to set its own objectives rather than just pursuing programmed goals. This requires some form of agency; the ability to choose what to value and pursue. General intelligence involves novel solutions that go beyond training data. This requires the kind of spontaneous, non-deterministic thinking we associate with free will. genuine moral reasoning requires the ability to choose between right and wrong, which presupposes free will. without this, an AI might simulate moral behavior but lack true moral agency. AGI needs to rewrite its own code and goals. This recursive self-improvement requires agency over one's own mental processes.
many will argue that human intelligence itself might be deterministic; that our sense of free will is an illusion created by complex but mechanistic processes. Additionally, they also argue that agency might be better understood as emergent complexity rather than some nonphysical property. A sufficiently sophisticated system might display all the functional properties of agency through purely computational means.
however I find these arguments completely lacking and unfounded in reality. it's like saying a completely mechanical machine is possible of freewill.
>>509780829they have vested interest in binary. everything is setup for binary. nigger brain. also google analog computing and you'll see many people are talking about it but no one is actually implementing LARGE FPTA. double nigger.