Why doesn't the government give us free Lasik? - /pol/ (#509773666) [Archived: 564 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: OrpPbl+hUnited States
7/7/2025, 11:01:34 PM No.509773666
IMG_6843
IMG_6843
md5: 1ad245364725e7afc384f569182b73a1🔍
I did the math and it would cost $200B–$500B, once, not annually, to give all eligible adults in the USA free lasik procedures.
Replies: >>509773783 >>509773926 >>509774067 >>509775492 >>509775780 >>509776029
Anonymous ID: gZBdJereUnited States
7/7/2025, 11:02:52 PM No.509773783
>>509773666 (OP)
Let me know. I could use it
Digits say it's a good idea
Anonymous ID: TKCdcsFrUnited States
7/7/2025, 11:04:38 PM No.509773926
>>509773666 (OP)
>free
>it would cost $200B–$500B
do you hear yourself
Replies: >>509774486
Anonymous ID: RycQw5Wr
7/7/2025, 11:06:16 PM No.509774067
>>509773666 (OP)
That shit can give you horribly dry eyes after years and many people don't recommend it. Just wear contacts if you loom bad in glasses
Anonymous ID: OrpPbl+hUnited States
7/7/2025, 11:11:45 PM No.509774486
>>509773926
>cost: $300B one-time federal expenditure
>covers approx. 200 million eligible adults (~$1,500 per eye avg)
>eliminates recurring eyewear and contact lens costs (~$500/year/person)
>saves consumers collectively ~$60-80B/year in vision correction expenses
>reduces employer health insurance claims related to eye care
>improves workplace productivity: less eye strain, fewer screen-related headaches, better focus
>fewer sick days due to eye infections, lens complications, or vision-related migraines
>military, aviation, law enforcement, and high-precision jobs benefit from universally corrected vision
>reduces auto accidents caused by poor eyesight, saving billions in damages and healthcare costs
>long-term drop in national healthcare expenditure linked to chronic eye care (~$15-20B/year)
>increased labor force efficiency—especially in visually intensive fields (tech, logistics, medicine)
>boost to national GDP via improved human capital performance
>reduces disability claims and workforce dropout from uncorrected vision
>enables lower-income workers who can’t afford regular optometry to stay competitive
>massive deflationary effect on optometry services, forcing innovation or exit
>frees up consumer spending from eyewear to other sectors, stimulating broader economy
>one-time cost repaid within 4–6 years via productivity and healthcare savings alone
>becomes permanent infrastructure upgrade to national human performance

Benefits outweigh the costs
Replies: >>509774924
Anonymous ID: ZYJqZXoyUnited States
7/7/2025, 11:17:23 PM No.509774924
>>509774486
Sounds like a huge decrease in GDP, parma, and lender profits, anon. Are you sure permanently fixing people's health issues is a sustainable business model?

[spoiler]Spoiler: iI's not. Have more corn syrup and seed oils, goy[/spoiler]
Anonymous ID: TCRIBHO1
7/7/2025, 11:24:09 PM No.509775492
>>509773666 (OP)
nah, I like glasses.
Anonymous ID: mtrVQ5VzAustralia
7/7/2025, 11:27:36 PM No.509775780
jewish-blue-kippah-eyeglasses-shema-600w-2987504-779115240
>>509773666 (OP)
Tax dollars should be used to punish the dysgenic, not support you.
Anonymous ID: Y2azfisEUnited States
7/7/2025, 11:30:31 PM No.509776029
>>509773666 (OP)
pearl powder, better nutrition, and sleeping in pitch darkness should improve eye sight