>>509773666 (OP) That shit can give you horribly dry eyes after years and many people don't recommend it. Just wear contacts if you loom bad in glasses
AnonymousID: OrpPbl+h
7/7/2025, 11:11:45 PM No.509774486
>>509773926 >cost: $300B one-time federal expenditure >covers approx. 200 million eligible adults (~$1,500 per eye avg) >eliminates recurring eyewear and contact lens costs (~$500/year/person) >saves consumers collectively ~$60-80B/year in vision correction expenses >reduces employer health insurance claims related to eye care >improves workplace productivity: less eye strain, fewer screen-related headaches, better focus >fewer sick days due to eye infections, lens complications, or vision-related migraines >military, aviation, law enforcement, and high-precision jobs benefit from universally corrected vision >reduces auto accidents caused by poor eyesight, saving billions in damages and healthcare costs >long-term drop in national healthcare expenditure linked to chronic eye care (~$15-20B/year) >increased labor force efficiency—especially in visually intensive fields (tech, logistics, medicine) >boost to national GDP via improved human capital performance >reduces disability claims and workforce dropout from uncorrected vision >enables lower-income workers who can’t afford regular optometry to stay competitive >massive deflationary effect on optometry services, forcing innovation or exit >frees up consumer spending from eyewear to other sectors, stimulating broader economy >one-time cost repaid within 4–6 years via productivity and healthcare savings alone >becomes permanent infrastructure upgrade to national human performance
>>509774486 Sounds like a huge decrease in GDP, parma, and lender profits, anon. Are you sure permanently fixing people's health issues is a sustainable business model?
[spoiler]Spoiler: iI's not. Have more corn syrup and seed oils, goy[/spoiler]