Thread 509791352

What is the deepest/most impactful statement that you have ever seen?

For me:

e^(pi*i)+1=0 - I have no idea what it means, and I’m pretty sure no one else does, either, but it is the most profound thing that I have ever seen in my life.

>>509791352 (OP)
Some aus anon said
>marriage is fake, only divorce is real
And I was like “damn”
It had like 70 yous

>>509791352 (OP)
Pingas + Bagina = Bebbe(?)

Niggers tongue my anus

There is no such thing as love.

>>509791352 (OP)
"It don't matter what you do, but go do it, cuz the rent is due."
Malcolm Luther Gandhi

>>509791352 (OP)
it's energy over pi x infinity plus 1 comes out to less than 1 (which isn't accurate. Times 1 would of been 0)
pi can never round itself off to be a complete number. it's just keeps fractioning off.

They don’t think it be like it is but it do

>>509791352 (OP)
i know what it means

>>509793877
What does it mean?

>>509791352 (OP)
>e^(pi*i)+1=0 - I have no idea what it means
In maths, solutions to equations are real numbers until you start using complex numbers with include the 'imaginary' number i to get around the fact some functions don't have solutions using only real numbers (e.g. x^2 +1 = 0).
In complex analysis, it can be shown that y = e^ix is equivalent to y = cos(x) + i*sin(x), giving the usually only exponential function a kind of circular interpretation once we include the imaginary axis.
The argument, x, is just what angle we want to look at (in radians). And an angle of pi is equivalent to 180 degrees clockwise from the origin.
Thus, e^i*pi evaluates to cos(pi) + i*sin(pi) which is like cos(180) + i*sin(180) which equals -1 + i*0 giving us the famous relation.
It's maybe a bit easier to follow if you keep in mind that cos refers to a horizontal value of the point, sin the point's vertical value, and x is the angle of rotation. to have a radius pointing towards the point (labelled in green in picrel).

>>509794870
r/whoosh

>>509793961
it means your a faggot

>>509795460
Your=/=you’re

You’re welcome!

>>509794870
>We are simply rotating the fourth roots of unity about an angle of x radians.
Why didn't you just say so?