Logistics guy here. Our inventory is spread out over dozens of warehouses across the Central states and the Midwest.

If I get these AI forklifts, I can replace my 60+ drivers with a handful of regional techs and a couple of Indian CS grads. Sure, I’ll have to modify our shipping contracts to be driver assist, but even with that expense we’re still making solid profits. So glad Trump supports the H1B program.

MAGA

this is only starting
the next decade is going to be glorious

>>509795632 (OP)
I wonder what their insurance providers think about it.

>>509795632 (OP)
This shits a scam. You know it, I know it.

>>509796167
Who needs insurance when you’re whole workforce is robots?

>>509796211
100% chance they are just being operated remotely by Indians.

>>509795632 (OP)
I don't think you'd need AI for this
Organizing and storage can be hard coded logically if you have software developers and IT dudes who know what the hell they're doing and there is a clearly defined set of rules for how organization and grouping of goods should work. The rest can just be sensor driven. My money is on this >>509797022

>>509795632 (OP)
>and a couple of Indian CS grads.
I hope you get to enjoy watching your family being skinned alive in front of you

>>509795632 (OP)
A chink and a jew will steal the tech and put you out of business in a year. Good luck it's wacky out there. To scale !

It's not AI its remove workers.

>>509795632 (OP)
Pajeets can now remote drive forklifts. Not fair.

>>509796167
If we knew the full extent that the insurance kikes have sucked the fun out of the world their own premiums would go up due to the increased risk of them being dragged from their desks

>>509796167
Insurance for stuff is generally cheaper than people involved. Its the peoples medical bills and other expenses that drives the insurance cost up.The less human involved will mean that insurance cost will be way cheaper.

>>509795632 (OP)
there's a 0% chance this is real btw

>>509800755
You seriously think kikes will lower the prices they literally just make up

>>509797022
Honestly, if we must employ poos, let us employ them remotely so they stay in pooland.

>>509795632 (OP)
>strapped an ai kit to it
Okay...
>all goods just sitting easily accessible on the floor
>nothing slightly tilted or askew on the pallet
>nothing in racks 14 ft high
Yeah they never worked in a real warehouse

>>509801763
The AI doesn't shit up the place like wagies

>>509797022
kek

>>509801763
>No broken fucked up pallets
>No weird non standard pallets for some reason
I bet this thing will work for a few days before damaging something so valuable that it would have been better to hire someone for an entire year. Or it'll have a technical issue easily detected by a non indian operator, keep driving and destroy itself.
Is it even loading and unloading trucks? If not then it really is utterly useless. And no driver is going to accept the AI forklift loading shit without consideration of how he wants it loaded.

>forklift 'drivers' absolutely malding ITT
>it don't be real nigga!

>>509804352
Nigger, them frogs in da machine will play up at some point and without a kill switch there will be no negotiations.
Submit to the machine where male chicks are sent at birth to know mercy.

I call bullshit. Believe the hustle if you must.

https://github.com/Victor-Boyd

>>509803423
The time and effort spent making sure that all the pallets are properly wrapped and balanced so that Mr roboto doesn't drop stuff is inconsequential compared the savings made by not paying an operator.

Also this:
>>509801763
AI forklifts won't be doing the sort of high speed, high risk maneuvers cause pallets to fall over or come apart when they're being loaded by humans. If anything, AI will be safer, because you can strap cameras to the boom and let it see exactly what the load space looks like up close, instead of the typical *crunch* "Fuck" method for loading awkward items into tight loads.

>>509804352
What do you think a company like Fed Ex or Toll is more likely to do, start rejecting bad loads and broken pallets or stipulate use of hard containers (i.e. standard airfreight packing rules), exchange for -$70000 (not including super) per forklift, per year to payroll? This is already the standard for stuff like air freight Even better, they can charge customers a "human loader" premium if their item is badly packed or just awkward.
People naysaying this stuff don't lack foresight, as much as they lack basic common sense and an understanding of how economics work.

>>509805349
We already have cameras in our reach trucks. I know you guys are next to the asshole of the world but you pretend to be a first world country.

>>509796552
>What can possibly go wrong with machines and warehouses bros...

>>509797022
That's what "AI" stands for. Actually Indians. Good day, saar

>>509805349
Mr roboto probably doesn't even need that shit to be wrapped because it can range all day and night and weekend to go slow and steady.
It also probably has gyroscopes and shit

Also why wouldn't they have a wrapping robot to do that?
We have them for hay bails

>>509795632 (OP)
I like how low IQ communists think that they are hurting maga with their h1b hiring moves.
You realize that you dumbasses are only replacing yourselves in your commy cities. The only time the indian plague comes out to us is to be a 7-11 worker.

>>509805915
>it can go slow and steady no need to wrap bro
>load goes in truck
>truck hits pothole
>shit goes everywhere
Bravo dickhead.

>>509805518
I'm talking about loading to and from trucks with a standard forklift, since that's really the only time a machine might, MIGHT have trouble being as space efficient as an experienced human. Loading and unloading from racking isn't even worth talking about, since anything that goes into racking is going to be a normalized shape and can't have bad wrapping, broken pallets etc. unless your company likes having to make insurance claims.

>>509805915
Wrapping machines have been around for a few decades now, any decent sized warehouse will have at least one. The main problem with them is that they wrap the pallet tightly, so if the stacking is shit, then it falls apart immediately, instead of on the tines or in transit, which can slow stuff down. But again, when it came to a choice between companies paying human to wrap stuff manually or using machines that need the pallets to be stacked a certain way (i.e. properly), companies picked machines and cut the people. People who assume that companies will stick with humans over AI, are like teamsters scoffing at the idea of using trains over horses, because trains can only run on tracks, instead of roads.