>>509798671>For some reason humans stopped being greedy, selfish and sex obsessed.I can believe it if they actually genetically engineered these traits out of humans. Not for a malicious reason, but because of things like an exploding population in the billions and nuclear (or worse weapons), there would be a need to do that. But it seems that at some point they then made it illegal to do genetic engineering. Perhaps the human race was actually starting to lack genetic diversity (the kind that actually matters, and governs behaviour, not the external traits). A lot of things like this though they tend to just leave it open.
>We have to take into account this all happened with the cold war in the backgroundI'm well aware that of the context and what he was trying to do, I think his intentions were good and that he thought he was "whitepilling" people but it's not really a whitepill if it's a comforting lie.
>As if humans aren't made for not having problems.Well this is the thing that adds a bit of depth and realism to the matrix films, when we learn the first version of it created by the machines was utopian and perfect and the humans rejected it en mass and it failed spectacularly. And it took them multiple versions, with a "lesser" and more "intuitive" machine mind that suggested changes that meant humans had lives and worries of the 20th century.
What make Star Trek a bit dull is how they just arrive at the utopia and not a lot is explained about it. That's why I'm speculating about genetic engineering, because they don't give an answer. I don't mind a positive message, it is actually refreshing from how tired a cliche the dystopian sci fi has become, but at least with the dysoptian ones, they make some effort to explain to you how we got to the distopia (AI run amok, alien invasion, nuclear war, etc).
>>509799475See I remember passing mentions of those things (maybe it was in the original series) but did they dedicate an episode or two to it?