Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire*, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
>B-B-But the shitskins can just shit out a mutant in Caliwali and then move to Idaho!
WRONG, the EO states that Idaho will NOT recognize the birth certificate granted in California and your child will still be an ILLEGAL, STATELESS, WITHOUT CITIZENSHIP.
>Trumps Executive Order is as follows:
“policy of the United States” to no longer ISSUE or ACCEPT documentation of citizenship in two scenarios: “(1) when [a] person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when [a] person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.”
>B-B-B-But this doesn't apply retroactively.
That is what the SCOTUS case in October is for, SCOTUS rulings on Constitutional Interpretations and Questions (In this case the interpretation of Clause 1 of the 14th Amendment) are RETROACTIVE going back to the date the Amendment was ratified which in this case would be July 9th, 1868.
PS: This also applies to H1B Jeets.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
* = Pending Legal Case that might remove it from the list of states that NO LONGER has Birthright Citizenship for illegals and Temporary Visa holders (such as H1B jeets )
>>509798486 (OP)>WRONG, the EO states that Idaho will NOT recognize the birth certificate granted in CaliforniaSo are all Californians illegals in Idaho?
>>509798486 (OP)I thought it was supposed to be nationwide. Now it's only some of the states?
>>509798639If their parents were NOT Permanent Residents recognized by the Federal Government (Green Card) or their parents were NOT Citizens then YES those children of illegals or temporary visa holders are NOT RECOGNIZED AS CITIZENS in Idaho even if they have a "birth certificate"
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
>>509798704The SCOTUS ruling in October will be NATIONWIDE but until then it is by a STATE BY STATE basis. Either the state is FOLLOWING FEDERAL POLICY/LAW or they are in OPEN REBELLION against the REPUBLIC such as in the case of Caliwali.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
>>509798486 (OP)>flyover states makes it more inconvenient for people to live Nobody even thinks about moving to those states kek
>>509798807Enjoy the HUSTLE & THE BUSTLE as EVERY SINGLE SHITSKIN MOVES TO YOUR CITY.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>>509798486 (OP)If the 2nd Amendment can have restrictions put on it with their registration and background check bullshit, so can the 14th.
>>509798486 (OP)how is this possible I thought the federal government was in charge of citizenship how can some states not have an x?
>>509798722How does it work retroactively? If A is the son of B, and B is a greencard holder, but B is also the son of C, and C is an illegal immigrant, is both B and A's citizenship now in question?
>>509799103Because states are in OPEN REBELLION against the REPUBLIC and are IGNORING and REFUSING to ENFORCE FEDERAL LAW AND POLICY.
This is CIVIL WAR.
>>509799129The Executive Order is NOT retroactive
The MAJORITY OPINION released in OCTOBER by SCOTUS is what will be RETROACTIVE and that depends on what SCOTUS says in their MAJORITY OPINION.
Washington congratulated Jews for setting up shop. Wished them well.
On August 21, 1790, President George Washington composed a letter to the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, Rhode Island, and to its leader, Moses Seixas. Seixas had written a letter to Washington four days earlier. In this letter, Seixas described the benefits that his community received under the new Constitution and expressed his “deep sense of gratitude to the Almighty” for “a Government . . . erected by the Majesty of the People,” committed to the “liberty of conscience,” and “deeming every one, of whatever Nation, tongue, or language equal parts of the great governmental Machine.” Washington responded with a brief but powerful letter, expressing America’s enduring commitment to the principle of tolerance and the freedom of conscience.
>>509799129birth certificates and social security numbers exist
Gentlemen.
While I receive, with much satisfaction, your Address replete with expressions of affection and esteem; I rejoice in the opportunity of assuring you, that I shall always retain a grateful remembrance of the cordial welcome I experienced in my visit to Newport, from all classes of Citizens.
The reflection on the days of difficulty and danger which are past is rendered the more sweet, from a consciousness that they are succeeded by days of uncommon prosperity and security. If we have wisdom to make the best use of the advantages with which we are now favored, we cannot fail, under the just administration of a good Government, to become a great and a happy people.
The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship. It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.
It would be inconsistent with the frankness of my character not to avow that I am pleased with your favorable opinion of my Administration, and fervent wishes for my felicity. May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid. May the father of all mercies scatter light and not darkness in our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in his own due time and way everlastingly happy.
Go: Washington
>>509798486 (OP)As an immigrant this makes me happy
>>509799200I appreciate the info, but it doesn't really answer my question.
>>509799129No it would be any new babies. Also OP is wrong. He is thinking only states that sue keep their rights but there are other ways left open that block the order on all 50 states. Legal groups that represent thousands of people. All this ruling did is make it a mess for the lower courts. Its still blocked everywhere.
Muslims arrived in North America as early as the 17th century, eventually composing 15 to 30 percent of the enslaved West African population of British America. (Muslims from the Middle East did not begin to immigrate here as free citizens until the late 19th century.) Even key American Founding Fathers demonstrated a marked interest in the faith and its practitioners, most notably Thomas Jefferson.
As a 22-year-old law student in Williamsburg, Virginia, Jefferson bought a Qur’an – 11 years before drafting the Declaration of Independence.
The purchase is symbolic of a longer historical connection between American and Islamic worlds, and a more inclusive view of the nation’s early, robust view of religious pluralism.
>>509798486 (OP)And what about the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation anchor babies that are already citizens? This is a good start but the fight is far from over
>>509798486 (OP)I want to believe
Although Jefferson did not leave any notes on his immediate reaction to the Qur’an, he did criticize Islam as “stifling free enquiry” in his early political debates in Virginia, a charge he also leveled against Catholicism. He thought both religions fused religion and the state at a time he wished to separate them in his commonwealth.
Despite his criticism of Islam, Jefferson supported the rights of its adherents. Evidence exists that Jefferson had been thinking privately about Muslim inclusion in his new country since 1776. A few months after penning the Declaration of Independence, he returned to Virginia to draft legislation about religion for his native state, writing in his private notes a paraphrase of the English philosopher John Locke’s 1689 “Letter on Toleration”:
“[he] says neither Pagan nor Mahometan [Muslim] nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the commonwealth because of his religion.”
The precedents Jefferson copied from Locke echo strongly in his Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, which proclaims:
“(O)ur civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions.”
The statute, drafted in 1777, which became law in 1786, inspired the Constitution’s “no religious test” clause and the First Amendment.
>>509799329Are you really saying trump needs to be deported?
why doesnt this apply to all states? All of mexico is in caliwali
Jefferson’s pluralistic vision
Was Jefferson thinking about Muslims when he drafted his famed Virginia legislation?
Indeed, we find evidence for this in the Founding Father’s 1821 autobiography, where he happily recorded that a final attempt to add the words “Jesus Christ” to the preamble of his legislation failed. And this failure led Jefferson to affirm that he had intended the application of the Statute to be “universal.”
By this he meant that religious liberty and political equality would not be exclusively Christian. For Jefferson asserted in his autobiography that his original legislative intent had been “to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan [Muslim], the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination.”
>>509799285There is no way to accurately answer your question. SCOTUS can make it retroactive back to when the 14th was ratified which would be July 9th, 1868. Or they could make it retroactive to 1929 when the Green Card System was created, or they could make it retroactive to 1976 which was the last time the 1929 "deadline" was extended, it is entirely up to them on how widely to enforce it... all I can tell you is that they WILL rule in the Trump Administrations favor 5-4 or 6-3.
>>509798486 (OP)Why does it only end for those states?
By defining Muslims as future citizens in the 18th century, in conjunction with a resident Jewish minority, Jefferson expanded his “universal” legislative scope to include every one of every faith.
Ideas about the nation’s religiously plural character were tested also in Jefferson’s presidential foreign policy with the Islamic powers of North Africa. President Jefferson welcomed the first Muslim ambassador, who hailed from Tunis, to the White House in 1805. Because it was Ramadan, the president moved the state dinner from 3:30 p.m. to be “precisely at sunset,” a recognition of the Tunisian ambassador’s religious beliefs, if not quite America’s first official celebration of Ramadan.
Muslims once again provide a litmus test for the civil rights of all U.S. believers. Today, Muslims are fellow citizens and members of Congress, and their legal rights represent an American founding ideal still besieged by fear mongering, precedents at odds with the best of our ideals of universal religious freedom.
>>509799468Because in 22 states there are ACTIVIST JUDGES who are in OPEN REBELLION against the REPUBLIC and are REFUSING to enforce FEDERAL LAW AND POLICY.
SO the Executive Order only goes into play in 28 states on July 27th?
>Why July 27th?Because that is when SCOTUS said it goes into effect and SCOTUS is the highest court in the land so they have final say.
>>509799468Op is a dumbass. Its blocked everywhere since there will be lawsuits in all 50 states. The supreme court cant change law as they are written.
>>509799447Do brown illegal libtards think snark is going to stop me from deporting or killing them?
>>509799560INCORRECT
there are only lawsuits in 22 states
There are NO LAWSUITS and thus INJUNCTIONS (statewide) in 28 states.
>>509799557*it goes into effect* what does? Do you even know what they said you fucking moron? Kill yourself.
>>509799615THE EXECUTIVE ORDER WHICH IS AS FOLLOWS
>Trumps Executive Order is as follows:“policy of the United States” to no longer ISSUE or ACCEPT documentation of citizenship in two scenarios: “(1) when [a] person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when [a] person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.”
Please try to keep up
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>>509799593Let me tell you another one they left open. Class actions in all 28 other states.
IF ANYONE IS STILL CONFUSED AND IS A SHITLIB RETARD WHO ONLY TRUSTS NPR OR THEIR FAVORITE BARTENDER AT THE GAY BAR THEN PLEASE REFER TO PIC RELATED.
>>509799697Two more weeks until Injunctions in the 28 states?
Cope and seethe, shitlib.
>>509798486 (OP)>New HampshireWho knew that there was a hive of based yankees?
>>509799468Are you ready to give us Greenland yet? Stop being a load of chumps. Just hand it over, bitte schön.
>>509799762The ACLU already filed for relief for the states that didnt sue.
>>509798486 (OP)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBFX4EuAWHc
>>509799447Trump isn't brown retard, I wouldn't even care if he was an illegal immigrant (he isn't).
The US is a White country, this is explicitly stated everywhere prior to 1965
>>509800006Hes an immigrant. His dad was an anchor baby. Steven miller is a 1st generation anchor baby KEK
>>509799905They can file all they want, they still need a Federal Judge to grant them relief which means an Injunction! Good luck doing that in the 28 states, shitlib! AAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
Latinas
md5: b6f4754794285bbaa4ff0c17c54583d9
🔍
>>509798486 (OP)I wanted to give birth in Texas! I'm not having an anchor baby in New Mexico, Arizona, California, or Nevada!
>>509800216Based. You child would have been born a cut above the rest. If you are a spic, then forget it. You are subhuman from day one.
t. Native born Texan
>>509799315You have to go back to the desert now ahmed.
>>509799560They pretended that abortion was constitutionally protected for like 60 years in spite of the document never mentioning abortion. They can make it say whatever.
>>509800070>Steven MillerJewish.
>Trump>immigrantAgain, he's White. I don't give a shit that he's an anchor baby. It's the brown anchor babies that gotta go. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
>>509800817White = ALRIGHT
BROWN = GOTTA GO!
>>509798486 (OP)Wouldn't that fracture the Union? Trump is setting a very odd precedent.
>>509800976>Wouldn't that fracture the unionYES, and that's a GOOD THING.
>>509801009You want your country to balkanize into meme States?
>>509801177I want SCOTUS to be FORCED to make a ruling on the 14th Amendment which they have been IGNORING for over 120 years.
>>509801177>You want your country to balkanize into meme States?Absolutely. The alternative is to allow a small group of self declared coastal elites to control everything in my life. If California wants to cause problems then it's their problem to sort out.
delulu anon as at it again...he has nothing better to do than post his schizo ramblings on birthright citizenship as if he was SCOTUS himself kek
>>509801268Hey moron this president will never take the merits case to the supreme court just like he never took the cases where he lost in circuit courts regarding his attack on lawfirms to the supreme court. Because its a weak case. TACO
>>509798486 (OP)sandniggers will flood blue states even more
>>509798486 (OP)so if it's retroactive then why are there stated that acknowledge it and those that don't ?
