“The replacement of the bourgeois state by the proletarian state is impossible without a violent revolution.”
— State and Revolution (1917)

To Lenin, nonviolence was not just ineffective, it was naive. He viewed pacifism as a form of class collaboration, something that helped preserve capitalist oppression. He criticized socialists who favored peaceful, legalistic paths to socialism as betraying the working class. So if you reject violence entirely, Lenin would likely see your position as ideologically weak or counter-revolutionary. That doesn’t mean you’re wrong, just that you’re out of step with Leninist doctrine, which treats violence as a necessary and justified tool for revolutionary change.

Should be a picture of Jesus actually.

>>509829685 (OP)
kys russnigger

>>509829685 (OP)
But I did the reading.

>>509829685 (OP)

I got the quick run down from my favorite Palestinian-Israeli influencer Nas Daily.

So no need to read.

https://x.com/nasdaily/status/1942206755351540215?s=46&t=_N3iWvi8V85bKBb29U1NEg