>>509864799>organisms don't progress toward better adaptation to their environment.I have no opinion on the subject, we are talking about what darwinism says. natural selection is the environment changing and the survivors passing on their traits, like a rat surviving while dinosaurs go extinct. there is no call for self-actualization, cardinality or "success", only the observation that what seem to be conscious adaptations to an environment are actually the result of chance and change. it is what differences darwinism from lamarckism
>>509864938>Prettysure they passed a value judgement on capitalismdid a marxist ever pass value judgement on capitalism? yes
but the marxist critique of capitalism isn't a value judgement. through "capital" marx never really passes value judgement, he rarely ever did in his other writings, because one of the points was that reality was more important than morals
>All political views are inherently moral onesno. marxism takes it's materialist stance from feuerbach for example, whose point was precisely that morals (particularly religion) were a human reflection/invention rather than a transcendental truth. in the anti-duhring engels states that although the political movement carries a morality, such morality is merely the result of circumstances and it shouldn't be the party doctrine
>>509865350you mean 3 axes, but even then, no, it could be a trapezoid fro example. the fact that one of the corners is empty should be a hint