I don't buy it - /pol/ (#509859168) [Archived: 574 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: GYhIYsdkAustralia
7/8/2025, 10:04:36 PM No.509859168
c90d3679-beee-4568-a854-b75acb4bd31e
c90d3679-beee-4568-a854-b75acb4bd31e
md5: fd58abfeb8a0d6efa6de57f2b4fe948e🔍
I call bullshit, the list exists.
anybody else notice how the media's handling this pretty quietly? how the democrats aren't seizing upon a chance to screech and mock and spin things like they usually do?
I think trump has the list, he's either on it as well or it's possible he's blackmailing the democrat bigwigs with mutual destruction of the entire country if they don't let him go about his agenda.
so I guess you'd have to watch the democrats very closely for the next 3 years to see if their resistance tactics fall off or they start preaching peace with trump over say, a drop off in crime stats by the next reporting period, probably sometime between now and the middle of next year.
anybody checked in with nancy, AoC or others? they seem awful quiet the last day or so... they getting their narrative together?
Replies: >>509859306 >>509859387 >>509859620 >>509859892 >>509860099
Anonymous ID: qAvTLcd1United States
7/8/2025, 10:06:12 PM No.509859306
>>509859168 (OP)
Both sides are implicated and that's the real reason the Dems didn't release the list under Biden even if it would've seriously hurt Trump. That's the most obvious explanation.
Anonymous ID: Of48bBoRUnited States
7/8/2025, 10:07:20 PM No.509859387
>>509859168 (OP)
it's very sus, on god.
Anonymous ID: GYhIYsdkAustralia
7/8/2025, 10:10:46 PM No.509859620
>>509859168 (OP)
remember that as recently as last week the media, twitter fags and democrat dingus leaders were all trying on narratives like "the iran attack failed" and such. and now trump says there's no list when nancy's been like "trump's on it" for years, and the democrat machine pulls a saitama and goes "OK"
yeah, not adding up.
Anonymous ID: 2X1xU5JoUnited States
7/8/2025, 10:14:08 PM No.509859892
760ee3 (1)
760ee3 (1)
md5: c7a286d1a7e0ff7948a5536b3d55ef73🔍
>>509859168 (OP)
Look at how much the US spends on weapons.

We have a list of methodically compromised assets committing the worst of the worst crimes, and these people exist in every major institution across the globe, with evidence that can bury corporations, nations, etc. Why would our government willingly burn those assets who are now human weapons unless it's strategically advantageous? Why would the intel/three letter agences give up that leverage if they don't have to? All they need to do is tell the asset that this will destroy not only them, but their family if they don't comply. From my perspective, that's the brutal and disgusting reality of what happened to the list and evidence, and it's why we'll never get close to the truth of any of it, until all of these people involved are eventually dead. And even then, we'll get the "JFK files" nothing burger version.
Anonymous ID: GYhIYsdkAustralia
7/8/2025, 10:16:34 PM No.509860099
3daf9af6-17b9-41b2-8bf5-eebe511641b3
3daf9af6-17b9-41b2-8bf5-eebe511641b3
md5: 77d8946f0daed58c10eaf86328866a37🔍
>>509859168 (OP)
years of "TRUMP'S ON THE LIST!"
trump's DOJ: there is no list
Democrats: OK!
that's fucking weird, man.