>>509861937so there's no such thing as mutually assured blackmail destruction? it's long been alleged the list is so damaging that the united states would not survive its revelation, it sounds like a nuke. where have I heard of this tactic being used before... oh wait, global nuclear deterrence is based on mutually assured destruction. we already do this as a matter of global policy, it's not a stretch to say the list exists and trump struck a deal to keep it quiet.
you know how to prove it either way? watch the democrats in the next 2-3 years, if they suddenly go all Uniparty and side with trump over policy and couch it in stuff like "the crime rate dropped and stuff got cheaper" you'll know it's true.
they've never missed an opportunity to shit on trump, not once in a decade have they ever passed an opportunity, why now?