Anonymous
ID: osfwx4Ri
7/9/2025, 2:08:54 AM No.509877626
Everybody has already assumed the worst about the Epstein client list.
They've assumed that several high level government officials, corporate executives, and celebrities are on that list. People so integrated into the social fabric that outing their crimes would be catastrophic. Therefore, if it actually WASN'T that bad, they would WANT to reveal the contents of the list, in order to assuage fears and dissolve doubt about who is and is not on the list. HOWEVER, the fact that they are not doing this CAN ONLY MEAN that the list is as bad as we fear, or worse, because the damage and paranoia caused by not revealing it, and allowing everyone to assume the worst, is actually somehow LESS than the damage caused by the actual reveal.
FURTHERMORE, the fact that a partial list is not revealed means the community of perpetrators is so tight knit and volatile, that it can only be an all-or-nothing scenario, because they all must have blackmail on each other, furthering the notion that the highest levels of the most powerful people are implicated.
IN ADDITION, the blatant coverups about the very existence of the list (Pam It's-on-my-desk Bondi), and the changing narrative about the prison cameras and the Epstein timeline, means that the list is SO NUCLEAR that no amount of blatant, retroactive narrative fuckery is unjustified.
In conclusion, it logically follows that:
>The list is far worse than you think
>They'll do anything and kill anyone to keep you from knowing
>They're a very tight community of people with incredible social power
>They're all blackmailing each other and they run everything
They've assumed that several high level government officials, corporate executives, and celebrities are on that list. People so integrated into the social fabric that outing their crimes would be catastrophic. Therefore, if it actually WASN'T that bad, they would WANT to reveal the contents of the list, in order to assuage fears and dissolve doubt about who is and is not on the list. HOWEVER, the fact that they are not doing this CAN ONLY MEAN that the list is as bad as we fear, or worse, because the damage and paranoia caused by not revealing it, and allowing everyone to assume the worst, is actually somehow LESS than the damage caused by the actual reveal.
FURTHERMORE, the fact that a partial list is not revealed means the community of perpetrators is so tight knit and volatile, that it can only be an all-or-nothing scenario, because they all must have blackmail on each other, furthering the notion that the highest levels of the most powerful people are implicated.
IN ADDITION, the blatant coverups about the very existence of the list (Pam It's-on-my-desk Bondi), and the changing narrative about the prison cameras and the Epstein timeline, means that the list is SO NUCLEAR that no amount of blatant, retroactive narrative fuckery is unjustified.
In conclusion, it logically follows that:
>The list is far worse than you think
>They'll do anything and kill anyone to keep you from knowing
>They're a very tight community of people with incredible social power
>They're all blackmailing each other and they run everything
Replies: