Check out how much Indians have changed since the 16h century, surely the future is bright:

French account (16th c.)
>Indian craftsmen…were ‘indolent’ and ‘vile’ by their very nature

Jemima Kindersley (1760s)
>In her letters she refers to Indians as having “stupidity and low cunning,” framing them as inherently backward

Abbe J.A. Dubois (early 19th c.)
>described Hindu customs as "abominable and revolting," compared Hindus to cannibals, calling their habits "disgusting" and their food "revolting."

Rev. Hobart Caunter (1834)
>described the Bengalese as "notoriously licentious" and hill men as "servile, deceptive and cunning, utterly without honour or principle"

Charles Grant & James Mill (early 19th c.)
>Grant described Hindus as “a people exceedingly depraved,” and ridiculed Sanskrit medicine, astronomy, history, and geography as laughable nonsense. James Mill called Indians contemptuously “cowardly, unfeeling and mendacious”

John Bacon (1840)
>Bacon describes Hindus as “inert” and filled with “low cunning,” “superstition” and “fulsome sycophancy.” He complains their language is “a heap of allegories,” condemns Hindu beliefs as “absurd” and “monstrous,” and portrays the entire group as lacking compassion compared to the British

Charles Dickens (mid-19th c.)
>In a private correspondence, Dickens described Indians: “Look at the dogs, low, treacherous, murderous, tigerous villains.” He even endorsed extreme violence, calling for the “extermination” of Indian people and approving the mutilation of “wretched Hindoo”

Sir Richard Francis Burton (1850s travelogues)
>Indians are a “cowardly and slavish people”

Blackwood’s Magazine (1850s)
>Indians are “dark-skinned rapists,” “rapacious savages menacing the virtue of Britain”

Mark Twain (1897)
>expressed disgust at the Ganges, stating, "the memory of that sight will always stay by me, but not by request"

Murray’s, Cook’s travel guides (late 1800s)
>Indian train guards and hotels are inadequate, advised that native servants “should be quietly kept in their proper places,” and depicted local laborers as “swarming … like insects”

Albert Einstein (1920s)
>"Indians are biologically inferior"...."they can't think backward or forward by more than 15 minutes"

Adolf Hitler (1920s-1930s)
>"The Indian was incapable of ruling himself." "The British Empire did not conquer India with superior numbers of men, but with superior race." "The English have a faculty for treating peoples as half-monkeys... I don't even see that as entirely unjustified." "The British have taught the Indian how to walk upright. Without the British, these people would still be living in the trees like animals." "India is a place of chaos and weakness.” “They have a long history, but it is a history of decline and stagnation. Their culture is backward, superstitious, and weak.”

Winston Churchill (1942)
>"I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion."

>>509923378 (OP)
It's been 5000 years. It will never improve because the reason it sucks is because it's full of Pajeets. The state of India today is a racial expression of Pajeets as a people and a nation.

>>509923378 (OP)
fake and gay timmy
now finish sucking me off
faggot
kek

>>509923378 (OP)
some things never change

Realistically, the 2100s will be the start of the indian century because all countries will have been invaded by millions of indians and their nepotism will grant them all positions of power