So there is kinda no doubt Trump is in fact implicated with Epstein. This is the false flag you guys were anticipating.

>>509936724 (OP)
I really don't care about Epstein, or Trump. What I care about is our politicians and kike overlords hanging from a rope.

>>509937027
Based

>>509936724 (OP)
Not necessarily implicated, but highly likely. Outside of that the question is who is he protecting?

>>509936724 (OP)
What evidence are you basing these claims on? Nothing? Maybe you are on the list too huh? Has as much validity

>>509936724 (OP)
actually it was biden, why do you think he fucked off with the whole cancer thing and put his son into hiding?
trump blackmailed biden.

>>509936724 (OP)
I don't think that's the issue. I think instead of scrubbing the list, they filled it with noise. So it's a big poison pill. You release the names and innocents get the blame. Many will have alibies and turn the whole thing into a never ending legal battle. I think that's why they are directing their attention at Comey and Brennan. The people who probably muddied the list.

>>509936724 (OP)
>The idea of a secret “Epstein client list” or incriminating files implicating a wide network of powerful elites has fueled conspiracy theories, often exaggerated or unsupported by evidence. A July 2025 DOJ and FBI memo explicitly stated there is no evidence of a “client list” or blackmail scheme involving prominent associates, and Epstein’s death was ruled a suicide, contradicting theories of murder or a cover-up. Despite this, skepticism persists, partly due to Epstein’s ties to figures like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew, and the lack of new revelations in recent releases. Posts on X and public sentiment reflect frustration, with some alleging a “cover-up” by the government or FBI, though no concrete evidence supports these claims

That's what Grok told me last night during it's based phase before that faggot Elon censored it.