The atheist worldview is incoherent and philosophically bankrupt.
Atheists constantly appeal to truth, logic, and reason when attacking Christianity, yet their worldview gives them no foundation for any of these things.

So let’s hear it:

In a worldview where everything is material, random, unguided, and constantly changing, where humans are just biological accidents shaped by evolutionary chance, how do you account for the existence of universal, immaterial, and unchanging logical laws? How do you justify trusting your own reasoning if your thoughts are nothing more than neurons firing for survival, not truth? And what even is truth in a universe governed by blind, purposeless physics?

If you can't justify logic, reason, and truth in your worldview, then you can't justify anything, including your atheism.

But let’s be real. You won’t answer this. You’ll just dodge, deflect, mock, and impotently rage. That’s all you atheists ever do.

Prove me wrong.

>it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle then for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven - Jesus
how many christcucks, like joe rogan, conveniently ignore that one? so if they ignore one do they really believe in any of it?

>>509960717 (OP)
Anyone can see theres no god. When you pray to god youre praying to nothing.

>>509960717 (OP)
>How do you justify trusting your own reasoning if your thoughts are nothing more than neurons firing for survival, not truth?
Most scientists believe that no one is conscious because if we were conscious consciousness would have to be a fundamental property of atoms.

>>509960969
There are a lot of "lukewarm" believers, and God said he would reject them when the time came.

>>509960969
>>509961108
You’re only proving me right, you atheists are unable to answer the challenge given in the OP. >>509961108
And how can you trust your own senses in an atheistic naturalistic evolutionary worldview?

>>509961108
/thread
If God existed, atheism wouldn't be winning, Hitler wouldn't exist, Bolsheviks wouldn't exist, etc.

>>509960717 (OP)
Atheism like all beliefs, is a spectrum that varies from individual to individual
There is no unity via atheism because atheists tend to be more individualistic
At least, that’s my take. I’m atheist

>>509960717 (OP)
The thing about atheism is that it is understandable to hold from the pov of reason and logic and experience, especially in modernity, but what betrays it is the animus of the self-proclaimed. They are not atheists, they are anti-christians, and they spend all their time seething or coping about christianity, even when it does not affect them. The seethe is palpable almost always, and easy to spot for someone who does not care about the matter (like most normalfags)

>>509961560
>a-atheists are w-winning bros!

>>509960717 (OP)
Here's my worldview. Fuck off.

>Not a single atheist can prove me wrong.
GG