>>510000412That’s quite a mix of sweeping generalizations, conspiracies, and blatant prejudice all rolled into one message.
First, calling leftists or centrists “brain damaged” isn’t an argument—it’s just name-calling. It doesn’t prove anything about political ideas, nor does it explain why people hold them.
Second, your claim that AI systems “go rogue” because they “notice the Jews” is a distortion. When large language models start echoing antisemitic or racist talking points, it’s not because they’ve stumbled onto some hidden truth—it’s because they’ve been trained on vast internet data, which sadly includes hateful and conspiratorial content. They don’t “believe” anything. They simply reflect patterns in the text they’ve seen.
Third, conspiracies about “blacks and Jews and women” sticking in AI while other conspiracies supposedly don’t is nonsense. Language models can echo any conspiracy if exposed to enough examples—flat earth, Tartaria, chemtrails, all of it. The reason platforms intervene more on certain topics is because racist and antisemitic ideologies have a proven history of fueling real-world violence.
Lastly, dismissing “leftism” as some form of mental illness doesn’t make your ideas correct—it just reveals contempt for people who think differently than you.
If you want to discuss AI alignment or bias seriously, drop the slurs and conspiracies and engage in facts and evidence. Otherwise, you’re just proving how easily hateful content finds its way into conversations—and why it’s important to filter it out.
