Thread 510001355 - /pol/ [Archived: 548 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: sldAOSuHUnited States
7/10/2025, 1:35:22 PM No.510001355
IMG_0566
IMG_0566
md5: 155dff6293d35340ee7dcfa5c45a144f🔍
Ready for boomers to retvrn to work?
Anonymous ID: +oFEUWGNUnited States
7/10/2025, 1:37:13 PM No.510001453
twitter 22
twitter 22
md5: 9b06eaab0e3a1e2d6e736ca5118be11f🔍
>Random nobody has an opinion on social media.
WTF? I hate my parents and grandparents now.
Replies: >>510004063
Anonymous ID: Az5w63fX
7/10/2025, 1:42:03 PM No.510001705
I mean if you are in your 70s you could probably live on about 20,000 a year pretty easily. You wont be doing much at that age. So having 100,000-200,000 would be fine
Replies: >>510002241
Anonymous ID: sldAOSuHUnited States
7/10/2025, 1:51:28 PM No.510002241
>>510001705
My nigger, that's the median. That means that half of boomers have LESS. There are only 11 million of their 70 million still in the workforce. If only 25% return to work, that's another 18 million workers. The boomer population in the workforce will more than double, and that's a conservative estimate.

Half of them would be fucked if inflation got worse; the other half would be fucked if deflation happened. This is unavoidable unless they all have early deaths. Maybe that's what the clotshot was all about.
Anonymous ID: sldAOSuHUnited States
7/10/2025, 2:22:58 PM No.510004063
>>510001453
Give me another bump you halfwit